Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chlorfenapyr plus tolfenpyrad had 0.41 tunnels per infested leaf, the lowest reported.

A claim from Effectiveness of different chemical pesticides in controlling Tomato Leaf Miner (Tuta absoluta Meyrick, 1917) in Kathmandu, Nepal · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorfenapyr plus tolfenpyrad had 0.41 tunnels per infested leaf, the lowest reported.

Material
Kabitae1
Treatment
chlorfenapyr + tolfenpyrade0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pestt0
Outcome
tunnels per infested leafe0
Direction
feweste0
Value
0.41e0
Comparator
spinetorame0
Setting
Chandragirie2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68
e0

“The lowest infestation in leaves (11.26%) and fruits (0.94%), with the fewest tunnels per infested leaf (0.41) and fruit (0.22), was in chlorfenapyr + tolfenpyrad, followed by spinetoram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1288
e1

“tomato variety Kabita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–309
e2

“Chandragiri Municipality-1, Kathmandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–393
e3

“chlorfenapyr + tolfenpyrad, followed by spinetoram, were the most effective pesticides for managing Tuta absoluta under Chandragiri field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1645

Title

Effectiveness of different chemical pesticides in controlling Tomato Leaf Miner (Tuta absoluta Meyrick, 1917) in Kathmandu, Nepal

Asim Bastola; Bikash Kandel; Dipesh Bist; et al. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2025. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v13i8.2012-2020.7567

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e9fc76b4f1bc7bab739b60e0ca64fd68ceec407944bc69e36663a6a8f91efb71 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tolfenpyrad · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorfenapyr · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.