Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All intercropping treatments had high land equivalent ratios indicating yield advantage over sole cropping.

A claim from Influence of Maize and Cowpea Mixed Sowing on Forage Production and Quality Under Various Tillage Practices · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping treatments had high land equivalent ratios indicating yield advantage over sole cropping.

Taxon
Maize and CowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Treatment
intercropping treatmente0
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all intercropping treatment land equivalent ratio (LER) was recorded high indicating that yield advantages for intercropping as compared to sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–978
t0

“Maize and Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–29

Title

Influence of Maize and Cowpea Mixed Sowing on Forage Production and Quality Under Various Tillage Practices

Muhammad Kamran Khan; Shahid Ibni Zamir; Ihtisham Ul Haq; et al. Transylvanian Review 2016

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ea56141d365d139dfb1b636bd97025e64c60409cbc82b071e7f272477aad9c9f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this claim · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.