Claim · model-written summary
Aggregation ability ranked I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ G.
- Taxon
- common winter wheate1
- Outcome
- aggregation abilitye2
- Direction
- I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ Ge0
- Value
- 59.13 ± 3.18 ≥ 56.65 ± 2.46 ≥ 52.54 ± 2.24 ≥ 50.16 ± 1.67 ≥ 48.63 ± 6.25 of cond. unitse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ G or 59.13 ± 3.18 ≥ 56.65 ± 2.46 ≥ 52.54 ± 2.24 ≥ 50.16 ± 1.67 ≥ 48.63 ± 6.25 of cond. units”
e1“common winter wheat”
e2“aggregation ability:”
Title
V. P. Netsvetaev; O. V. Akinshina; L. S. Bondarenko Russian Journal of Genetics 2014. doi:10.1134/s1022795414110106
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Four isoenzymes explained electrophoretic variation in wheat beta-amylase.
- Observation Isoenzymes a and b were doubled and inherited at separate independent loci.
- Observation Three dominant factors controlled isoenzyme c.
- Observation Four loci controlled isoenzyme d.
- Observation Some of five wheat genotypes differed significantly in disulfide bond number.
- Observation Aggregation ability was significantly greater for group B than D.
- Observation Aggregation ability was significantly greater for group I than D.
- Mechanism Genotypes I and B were interpreted to improve dough rheology.