Abstract
We investigated a self-pollinated homozygous population of common winter wheat, F(-> ∞) 24/04 x Odesskaya krasnokolosaya, for variants of beta-amylase and the aggregation ability of the protein complex of weevil via disulfide bonds. It was found that variation in the electrophoretic types of this enzyme was due to four isoenzymes. Two of them (a and b) are doubled and controlled by separate loci with independent inheritance. Isoenzyme c was due to three dominant factors, and four loci were responsible for d. Analysis of the number of -S-S-bonds of five genotypes, which were harvested in 2013 and differed in the types of beta-amylase, showed that some of them were significantly different from others in this indicator. In general, the samples were grouped by the type of this enzyme, forming the following continuous series with respect to aggregation ability: I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ G or 59.13 ± 3.18 ≥ 56.65 ± 2.46 ≥ 52.54 ± 2.24 ≥ 50.16 ± 1.67 ≥ 48.63 ± 6.25 of cond. units. Significant differences were observed for this property between groups B > D and I > D. Therefore, genotypes having types I and B have a positive influence on the rheological properties of dough.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Four isoenzymes explained electrophoretic variation in wheat beta-amylase.
Verbatim
e0“variation in the electrophoretic types of this enzyme was due to four isoenzymes”
e1“common winter wheat, F(-> ∞) 24/04 x Odesskaya krasnokolosaya, for variants of beta-amylase”
Claim · model-written summary
Isoenzymes a and b were doubled and inherited at separate independent loci.
Verbatim
e0“Two of them (a and b) are doubled and controlled by separate loci with independent inheritance.”
e1“common winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Three dominant factors controlled isoenzyme c.
Verbatim
e0“Isoenzyme c was due to three dominant factors”
e1“common winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Four loci controlled isoenzyme d.
Verbatim
e0“four loci were responsible for d”
e1“common winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Some of five wheat genotypes differed significantly in disulfide bond number.
Verbatim
e0“some of them were significantly different from others in this indicator”
e1“common winter wheat”
e2“number of -S-S-bonds of five genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Aggregation ability ranked I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ G.
Verbatim
e0“I ≥ B ≥ F ≥ D ≥ G or 59.13 ± 3.18 ≥ 56.65 ± 2.46 ≥ 52.54 ± 2.24 ≥ 50.16 ± 1.67 ≥ 48.63 ± 6.25 of cond. units”
e1“common winter wheat”
e2“aggregation ability:”
Claim · model-written summary
Aggregation ability was significantly greater for group B than D.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed for this property between groups B > D and I > D.”
e1“common winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Aggregation ability was significantly greater for group I than D.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed for this property between groups B > D and I > D.”
e1“common winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes I and B were interpreted to improve dough rheology.
Verbatim
e0“genotypes having types I and B have a positive influence on the rheological properties of dough”
e1“common winter wheat”