Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silver Queen sweet corn was among the most tolerant to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron, with yield similar to the control.

A claim from Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) to Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver Queen sweet corn was among the most tolerant to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron, with yield similar to the control.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Material
Silver Queene4
Treatment
nicosulfuron and primisulfurone4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
similare4
Comparator
the controle4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Eight sweet corn cultivars differed in response to 35 g ai ha –1 nicosulfuron or 42 g ai ha –1 primisulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108
e4

“‘Landmark’, Silver Queen, and 'Sweetie 76’ were the most tolerant cultivars to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron with yield similar to that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–538

Title

Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) to Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron

David W. Monks; Charles A. Mullins; Kenneth E. Johnson Weed Technology 1992. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00034734

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-eaa1b7af83a4949e6ea1022bd75f5877a9f82226f88f68855ed0e8985023a985 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Primisulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.