Claim · model-written summary
Wheat straw return and biogas residue return improved dry matter and N translocation and N recovery efficiency compared with inorganic N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- wheat straw return (WS) and biogas residue return (BR)e1
- Outcome
- dry matter and N translocation, and N recovery efficiency (NRE)e1
- Direction
- improvede1
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer (IN)e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rice Dry Matter Accumulation”
e1“compared to inorganic N fertilizer (IN), wheat straw return (WS) and biogas residue return (BR) increased the rice yield by 2.11–4.28% and 4.78–7.67%, respectively, and also improved dry matter and N accumulation after the elongation stage (EG), dry matter and N translocation, and N recovery efficiency (NRE)”
Title
Xin Liu; Guochun Xu; Qiangsheng Wang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00047
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Wheat straw return increased rice yield by 2.11-4.28% compared with inorganic N fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Biogas residue return increased rice yield by 4.78-7.67% compared with inorganic N fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Wheat straw return and biogas residue return improved dry matter and N accumulation after the elongation stage compared with inorganic N fertilizer.
- Mechanism The improvements from organic matter return are attributed to an increase in leaf SPAD values and net photosynthetic rate after the elongation stage.
- Intervention effect Rice-duck farming promoted rice yield by 1.52-3.74% compared with conventional rice farming.
- Intervention effect Rice-duck farming contributed to higher leaf photosynthesis, dry matter and N accumulation, dry matter and N translocation, and N recovery efficiency compared with conventional rice farming.
- Intervention effect Insect-proof net cultivation decreased the intensity of sun radiation in the nets because of the net coverage.
- Intervention effect Insect-proof net cultivation declined leaf Pn, dry matter accumulation and translocation, N absorption and translocation, and NRE compared with open field cultivation.
- Intervention effect The rice yield under insect-proof net cultivation was 2.48-4.98% lower than under open field cultivation.
- Intervention effect The interaction between rice-duck farming and organic matter return improved rice yield by 5.26-9.33% compared with the interaction between conventional rice farming and inorganic N.
- Intervention effect The interaction between rice-duck farming and organic matter return increased dry matter and N accumulation after the EG, dry matter and N translocation, and NRE compared with the CR and IN interaction.