Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep N fertilization with straw return (MDS) enhanced N recovery efficiency by 141.45%–164.65% compared with MB.

A claim from Nitrogen Deep Placement Combined with Straw Mulch Cultivation Enhances Physiological Traits, Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Mechanical Pot-Seedling Transplanting Rice · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep N fertilization with straw return (MDS) enhanced N recovery efficiency by 141.45%–164.65% compared with MB.

Treatment
deep N fertilization and straw returne3
Outcome
N recovery efficiencye2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
141.45%–164.65%e2
Comparator
MB treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the MDS treatment enhanced the total N accumulation by 37.74%–43.69%, N recovery efficiency by 141.45%–164.65%, N agronomic efficiency by 121.76%–134.19%, nitrate reductase by 46.46%–60.86% and glutamine synthetase by 23.56%–31.02%, compared to the MB treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1211
e3

“MDS (deep N fertilization and straw return)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–517
e4

“two rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–214

Title

Nitrogen Deep Placement Combined with Straw Mulch Cultivation Enhances Physiological Traits, Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Mechanical Pot-Seedling Transplanting Rice

Li Lin; Zhang Zheng; Tian Hua; et al. Rice Science 2022. doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2021.12.008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9ab6f69dd4fb01ace5dd295a136e0b64d1405bea24458b6c692959450ac474e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

organic · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.