Intervention effectmodel-written summary

40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat grain yield of 2971 kg ha-1.

A claim from Impact of iron and zinc agronomic biofortification on yield, concentration and uptake of nutrients in wheat as affected by iron and zinc solubilizing microbial inoculants · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat grain yield of 2971 kg ha-1.

Treatment
40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2971 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107
e0

“Higher grain yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (2975 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (2971 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1184

Title

Impact of iron and zinc agronomic biofortification on yield, concentration and uptake of nutrients in wheat as affected by iron and zinc solubilizing microbial inoculants

Priya Satwadhar; Syed Ismail; Dhamak AL; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2024. doi:10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i4c.921

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-eaccc220b5c97890ed4fdfb4a9a14eff0c6e19413a62d6a98f51ddccca33eecf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.