Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Impact of iron and zinc agronomic biofortification on yield, concentration and uptake of nutrients in wheat as affected by iron and zinc solubilizing microbial inoculants

Priya Satwadhar; Syed Ismail; Dhamak AL; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

\Field experiment was conducted to improve Fe and Zn concentration and yield of wheat in response to varying Fe and Zn solubilizers and fertilizer application rates. The field experiment was carried out during rabi season of 2021-22 at research farm Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Experiment consists of thirty six treatment combinations which includes four iron and zinc solubilizing cultures (Control, Pseudomona striata, Pseudomona fluorescens, and Bacillus megaterium), three levels of iron sulphate (0, 20 and 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1) and three levels of zinc sulphate (0, 20 and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1) in factorial randomized block design. The results emerged out found significant effect of iron and zinc solubilizing microbial inoculants particularly Pseudomona striata and in levels of iron sulphate and zinc sulphate upto40 kg ha-1on yield and concentration of iron and zinc. Significant increase in grain yield was noted with the application of Pseudomona striata (2968 kg ha-1) over control. Higher grain yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (2975 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (2971 kg ha-1). Similarly, maximum straw yield noted with application of Pseudomona striata (5331 kg ha-1) over control. Further, in levels of iron sulphate and zinc sulphate higher straw yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (5612 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (5530 kg ha-1). Higher concentration of macro nutrients and micronutrients noted with application of Pseudomona striata + 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 +40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. Similarly, higher uptake of macro and micro nutrients found with microbial inoculant particularly Pseudomona striata and with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with recommended dose of fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomona striata increased wheat grain yield over control to 2968 kg ha-1.

Treatment
application of Pseudomona striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomona striatae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2968 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant increase in grain yield was noted with the application of Pseudomona striata (2968 kg ha-1) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat grain yield of 2975 kg ha-1.

Treatment
40 kg FeSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2975 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher grain yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (2975 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (2971 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat grain yield of 2971 kg ha-1.

Treatment
40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2971 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher grain yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (2975 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (2971 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomona striata gave maximum wheat straw yield of 5331 kg ha-1 over control.

Treatment
application of Pseudomona striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomona striatae0symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5331 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum straw yield noted with application of Pseudomona striata (5331 kg ha-1) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat straw yield of 5612 kg ha-1.

Treatment
40 kg FeSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5612 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher straw yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (5612 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (5530 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 gave higher wheat straw yield of 5530 kg ha-1.

Treatment
40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5530 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher straw yield found with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 (5612 kg ha-1) and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (5530 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Pseudomona striata and iron and zinc sulfate gave higher wheat macro and micronutrient concentrations.

Treatment
Pseudomona striata + 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 +40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Interactor
Pseudomona striatae0symbiont
Outcome
concentration of macro nutrients and micronutrientse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher concentration of macro nutrients and micronutrients noted with application of Pseudomona striata + 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 +40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomona striata with iron and zinc sulfate gave higher wheat macro and micronutrient uptake.

Treatment
Pseudomona striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomona striatae0symbiont
Outcome
uptake of macro and micro nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher uptake of macro and micro nutrients found with microbial inoculant particularly Pseudomona striata and with application of 40 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and 40 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1821 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.