Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pigeonpea with urdbean had a significantly higher benefit:cost ratio of 2.31 than maize and turmeric intercrops or sole pigeonpea.

A claim from Nutrient management for enhancing productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping system under rainfed condition · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea with urdbean had a significantly higher benefit:cost ratio of 2.31 than maize and turmeric intercrops or sole pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea + urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.31e0
Comparator
pigeonpea + maize, pigeonpea + turmeric and sole pigeonpeae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher B: C ratio was recorded under pigeonpea + sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) (2.32) and pigeonpea + urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] (2.31) intercropping systems than pigeonpea + maize, pigeonpea + turmeric and sole pigeonpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–989

Title

Nutrient management for enhancing productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping system under rainfed condition

I.B. PANDEY; S. TIWARI Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i4.5550

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-eafc17b9052d5da41e1d97a334d0f02e800822920099112c60545c77ccf6a40b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Vigna mungo · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.