Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nicosulfuron at 4 cm followed by cultivation gave sweet corn yield equal to hand-weeded controls.

A claim from Effect of Nicosulfuron Timing on Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Control in Sweet Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron at 4 cm followed by cultivation gave sweet corn yield equal to hand-weeded controls.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
nicosulfurone0
Interactor
wild-proso millete0weed
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
followed by one cultivation 14 d after applicatione0
Comparator
hand-weeded controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“Wild-proso millet control was 93% and sweet corn yields were equal to hand-weeded controls when nicosulfuron was applied to wild-proso millet 4 cm tall and followed by one cultivation 14 d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1454

Title

Effect of Nicosulfuron Timing on Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Control in Sweet Corn (Zea mays)1

BILL J. WILLIAMS; R. GORDON HARVEY Weed Technology 2000. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2000)014[0377:eontow]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-eb63d41b8dfdc00ada2a65097944ed26a22c415e37494091ae3d9158a1cbaebd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
    Corn yields under total POST mesotrione combinations were comparable to PRE programs.

    Comparison of Mesotrione Combinations with Standard Weed Control Programs in Corn · 2006 · compared with S -metolachlor plus atrazine PRE alone or fb nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron plus atrazine POST

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
  8. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.