Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize as a preceding crop with ploughing gave the highest grain yield and yield components.

A claim from GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS AT MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT PRECEDING CROPS AND SOIL TILLAGE CONDITIONS · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize as a preceding crop with ploughing gave the highest grain yield and yield components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize as preceding crop and ploughing as soil tillagee0
Outcome
grain yield and yield componentse0
Direction
highest valuese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of the grain yield and yield components were registered under maize as preceding crop and ploughing as soil tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1118

Title

GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS AT MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT PRECEDING CROPS AND SOIL TILLAGE CONDITIONS

Viorel ION; Adrian Gheorghe BASA; Marin DUMBRAVA; et al. AgroLife Scientific Journal 2015. doi:10.17930/agl201524

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ebb1baa9debde989d5a5219c6a8eb5fa9f0861afa0f0dadfdc00f8ab24ff2d0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Maize following maize with N40+80P40 had the highest cob length, kernel number, cob and kernel weights, but not thousand grain weight.

    Grain Yield and Yield Components at Maize under Different Preceding Crops and Nitrogen Fertilization Conditions · 2016

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    2-year rotation gave significantly higher maize yield (6721 kg/ha).

    Maize (Zea mays L.) yield stability dependence on crop rotation, fertilization and climatic conditions in a long-term experiment on Haplic Chernozem · 2013

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Corn grain yield in a legume/cash grain rotation was lower than under conventional management in the second year.

    Influence of alternative and conventional agricultural management on soil microbial processes and nitrogen availability · 1987 · compared with conventional management

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Across rainfed fields, continuous corn showed an average yield penalty of 4.3%.

    Continuous Corn and Soybean Yield Penalties across Hundreds of Thousands of Fields · 2017

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Corn yields declined with consecutive years of monocropping.

    Corn/Soybean Rotation Effect as Influenced by Tillage, Nitrogen, and Hybrid/Cultivar · 1991

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Continuous corn without cover had least yield.

    Managing Soil Carbon and Nitrogen for Productivity and Environmental Quality · 2004

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Cover crops in monoculture and mixtures did not influence corn yield.

    Cover Crop Options and Mixes for Upper Midwest Corn–Soybean Systems · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Rotation had higher yield variance than monoculture.

    Separating the Impacts of Crop Diversification and Rotations on Risk · 2001 · compared with monoculture

    Opposite direction

313 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Ploughing followed by harrowing gave the highest dry cob weight and 1000-seed weight.

    Effect of four different tillage practices on maize performance under rainfed conditions · 2012

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Conventional tillage had the highest ten-year maize yield, 10.61 t/ha.

    Long term effects of different soil tillage systems on maize (Zea mays L.) yields · 2011 · compared with RT and NT

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    No-tillage without red clover reduced corn grain yield by 13% versus conventional tillage over three years.

    Red Clover and Tillage Influence on Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Corn Emergence · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage treatment

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.