Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sudden drought caused less GB and free proline accumulation than gradual drought.

A claim from Interactive Effects of Sudden and Gradual Drought Stress and Foliar‐applied Glycinebetaine on Growth, Water Relations, Osmolyte Accumulation and Antioxidant Defence System in Two Maize Cultivars Differing in Drought Tolerance · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudden drought caused less GB and free proline accumulation than gradual drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Sudden DSe0
Outcome
accumulation of GB and free prolinee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
gradual DSe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sudden DS caused less accumulation of GB and free proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–403
e1

“two maize ( Z ea mays L.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–255
e2

“compared with the gradual DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–602

Title

Interactive Effects of Sudden and Gradual Drought Stress and Foliar‐applied Glycinebetaine on Growth, Water Relations, Osmolyte Accumulation and Antioxidant Defence System in Two Maize Cultivars Differing in Drought Tolerance

L.‐X. Zhang; J.‐H. Lai; Z.‐S. Liang; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2014. doi:10.1111/jac.12081

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ebe295ca7b2571892f456b245841df095dd87ad4be0d706aed6a604f6943379b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

44 papers: 28 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.