Claim · model-written summary
Authors attributed growth and yield suppression under sub fertigation mainly to salinity stress.
- Taxon
- Tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- sub fertigation systeme0
- Outcome
- growth and yield suppressione0
- Qualifier
- salinity stress, not by water stresse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield suppression in the sub fertigation system seems to be mainly caused by salinity stress, not by water stress.”
t0“Tomatoes”
Title
Shahnaz Sarkar; Yoshikazu Kiriiwa; Masanobu Endo; et al. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 2008. doi:10.2503/jjshs1.77.143
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Sub fertigation reduced growth, yield and fruit size across nutrient formulations.
- Intervention effect Sub fertigation increased fruit soluble solid content.
- Intervention effect Sub fertigation inhibited water uptake relative to drip fertigation.
- Intervention effect Medium EC was higher under sub than drip fertigation.
- Intervention effect Medium EC was higher with Shizudai than Enshi formulation.
- Observation Sub × Shizudai had the highest medium EC at 29.6 dS·m−1.
- Observation Drip × Enshi had the lowest medium EC at 16.1 dS·m−1.
- Intervention effect Sub fertigation raised medium matric potential relative to drip fertigation.
- Intervention effect Leaf proline concentration was higher with sub than drip fertigation on the two sampling dates.