Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Thirty-centimeter rice hull burning raised onion yield 44.2% over no burning.

A claim from Evaluation of cultural practices (surface burning, deep ploughing, organic amendments) for management of rice root-knot nematode in rice - onion cropping system and their effect on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-centimeter rice hull burning raised onion yield 44.2% over no burning.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
rice hulls burned to 30 cm deepe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44.2%e0
Comparator
no RHBe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the thickness of rice hulls burned to 30 cm deep resulted in a yield increase of 44.2% over no RHB and 11.9% over 15-cm-deep rice hulls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–762
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 181–209

Title

Evaluation of cultural practices (surface burning, deep ploughing, organic amendments) for management of rice root-knot nematode in rice - onion cropping system and their effect on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield

E.B. Gergon; S.A. Miller; R.G. Davide; et al. International Journal of Pest Management 2001. doi:10.1080/09670870110047118

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ec708a4d9645fdfa28995525c27daf7d70337176a4dc1c1c64eec9925701265c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Oryza sativa · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.