Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Onion yield was maximal at 5.166 kg/plot and 387.46 q/ha with December 1 transplanting and wheat straw mulch.

A claim from Effect of date of transplanting and mulching on growth, yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Nasik Red · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield was maximal at 5.166 kg/plot and 387.46 q/ha with December 1 transplanting and wheat straw mulch.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
Nasik Rede1
Treatment
1st December planting with wheat straw mulchinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.166 kg/plot and 387.46 q/hae0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (5.166 kg/plot and 387.46 q/ha) were found maximum at 1st December planting with wheat straw mulching (T7).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Nasik Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–328

Title

Effect of date of transplanting and mulching on growth, yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Nasik Red

Bhagauti Prasad; Sutanu Maji; Kamal Ram Meena Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2017. doi:10.31018/jans.v9i1.1156

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-ee2a5bd75cb0ac6b53df66f132612192fd2d109232b8bd403a4c7f7bc717df94 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Triticum aestivum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.