Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying K, Zn and B at heading improved wheat nutrition and processing quality.

A claim from Effects of Combined Use of K,Zn and B Fertilization on Yield and Quality of High Gluten Wheat in Sandy and Loamy Chaotu Soil · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying K, Zn and B at heading improved wheat nutrition and processing quality.

Treatment
Spraying K,Zn and B fertilizer at heading stagee0
Outcome
nutrition quality and processing qualitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying K,Zn and B fertilizer at heading stage had a certain effect on nitrogen metabolism of wheat,and could increase the activities of nitric acid reductases(NR) and Alanine transaminase(GPT) in flg leaves,so improve the nutrition quality and processing quality of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–606

Title

Effects of Combined Use of K,Zn and B Fertilization on Yield and Quality of High Gluten Wheat in Sandy and Loamy Chaotu Soil

Wang Li-qiu He'nan nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ee353683ed34c1cd826448017caadd13158aa0ef1181affd5484cd5a9d1f9ad1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

boron atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.