Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn(Gln)2 priming significantly increased wheat grain protein content against control.

A claim from The effectiveness of seed priming with synthetic zinc-amino acid chelates in comparison with soil-applied ZnSO4in improving yield and zinc availability of wheat grain · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn(Gln)2 priming significantly increased wheat grain protein content against control.

Treatment
[Zn(Gln)2]e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming with [Zn(Gln)2], [Zn(Arg)2], and [Zn(His)2] significantly increased grain protein content of wheat in comparison with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–635

Title

The effectiveness of seed priming with synthetic zinc-amino acid chelates in comparison with soil-applied ZnSO4in improving yield and zinc availability of wheat grain

Mozhgan Seddigh; Amir Hossein Khoshgoftarmanesh; Somayeh Ghasemi Journal of Plant Nutrition 2015. doi:10.1080/01904167.2015.1069340

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ee537add81e349d252c421feb86f260d6cb8f7e04b2b9d39a4a489cad584c3b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.