Paper · 2011 · Journal of Northwest A & F University

Effect of Zn application methods on distribution of Zn,phytate and protein in wheat pearling fractions

Liu Bing-ran

16
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 In order to alleviate Zn deficiency in human beings and provide therotical basis for its bioawailability,this study was conducted to assess the effect of Zn application methods on distribution of Zn,phytate and protein in wheat pearling fractions.【Method】 A field experiment of soil and foliar application methods of Zn fertilizer was conducted for 2 winter wheat cultivars(Shaan 715 and Xinong 889) in potentially Zn-deficient calcareous soil,with four main treatments,control(CK),soil application of Zn(15 kg/hm2),foliar application of Zn(quality concentration is 3 g/L,total quantity is 1.5 kg/hm2) and soil and foliar application of Zn.Six pearling fractions(P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6) of wheat grain were obtained using JMJ3 rice polishers,and P1-P5 were bran fractions of wheat grain,P6 mostly endosperm,and the concentration of Zn,phytate,protein of every wheat pearling fractions were determined.【Result】 Compared with the control treatment(no Zn application),the methods of soil+foliar application and foliar application of Zn increased Zn concentration in P1-P5 fractions by 53.4%,43.2%,respectively;and increased Zn concentration in P6 fraction by 61.1%,52.7%,respectively;However,soil application of Zn only did not increase.Generally,the P2 fraction(the outer 4%-8% layer of wheat grain) had the highest Zn and phytate concentrations,whereas the P3 fraction(the outer 8%-12% layer) ranked the highest for protein concentration.All the three components showed a diminishing trend as pearling progressed from the outer layers to the inner part of wheat grain.The effect of the three treatments of applying Zn on concentration of phytate in P1-P5 was not significant;however,the application of Zn increased phytate concentration in P6 and decreased the protein content in wheat pearling fractions.The phytic acid to Zn molar ratios significantly decreased under the soil+foliar application and foliar application treatments,whereas,the effect of soil application of Zn on grain Zn bioavailability was not significant.【Conclusion】 The distribution of Zn,phytate,protein in wheat grain is uneven,the concentrations of three components are higher in the outer layer especially the aleurone tissue;the lowest concentration occurs in the starchy endosperm.Zn application methods and cultivars have not positive effect on the distribution patterns of the three components between the outer and inner parts of wheat grain.Compared with the three Zn application methods,the foliar application of Zn fertilizer to wheat is the economical and effective method to attain high Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain especially for the endosperm,while alleviating Zn deficiency in human.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased zinc concentration in bran fractions by 53.4%.

Treatment
soil+foliar applicatione0
Outcome
Zn concentration in P1-P5 fractionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.4%e0
Comparator
control treatment(no Zn application)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control treatment(no Zn application),the methods of soil+foliar application and foliar application of Zn increased Zn concentration in P1-P5 fractions by 53.4%,43.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc increased zinc concentration in bran fractions by 43.2%.

Treatment
foliar application of Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentration in P1-P5 fractionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.2%e0
Comparator
control treatment(no Zn application)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control treatment(no Zn application),the methods of soil+foliar application and foliar application of Zn increased Zn concentration in P1-P5 fractions by 53.4%,43.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased endosperm zinc concentration by 61.1%.

Treatment
soil+foliar applicatione1
Outcome
Zn concentration in P6 fractione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.1%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased Zn concentration in P6 fraction by 61.1%,52.7%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“the methods of soil+foliar application and foliar application of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc increased endosperm zinc concentration by 52.7%.

Treatment
foliar application of Zne1
Outcome
Zn concentration in P6 fractione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased Zn concentration in P6 fraction by 61.1%,52.7%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil+foliar application and foliar application of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc alone did not increase grain fraction zinc concentration.

Treatment
soil application of Zne0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However,soil application of Zn only did not increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P2 fraction had the highest zinc and phytate concentrations.

Organ / stage
P2 fractione0
Outcome
Zn and phytate concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the P2 fraction(the outer 4%-8% layer of wheat grain) had the highest Zn and phytate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1350 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P3 fraction had the highest protein concentration.

Organ / stage
P3 fractione0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the P3 fraction(the outer 8%-12% layer) ranked the highest for protein concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six pearling fractions(P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6) of wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc, phytate and protein concentrations declined toward inner grain layers.

Outcome
three componentse0
Direction
diminishinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the three components showed a diminishing trend as pearling progressed from the outer layers to the inner part of wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatments did not significantly change phytate concentration in bran fractions.

Treatment
three treatments of applying Zne0
Outcome
concentration of phytate in P1-P5e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the three treatments of applying Zn on concentration of phytate in P1-P5 was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased phytate concentration in P6.

Treatment
application of Zne0
Outcome
phytate concentration in P6e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Zn increased phytate concentration in P6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application decreased wheat fraction protein content.

Treatment
application of Zne0
Outcome
protein content in wheat pearling fractionse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Zn increased phytate concentration in P6 and decreased the protein content in wheat pearling fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc significantly lowered phytic acid to zinc molar ratio.

Treatment
soil+foliar applicatione0
Outcome
phytic acid to Zn molar ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The phytic acid to Zn molar ratios significantly decreased under the soil+foliar application and foliar application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly lowered phytic acid to zinc molar ratio.

Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
phytic acid to Zn molar ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The phytic acid to Zn molar ratios significantly decreased under the soil+foliar application and foliar application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc alone did not significantly affect grain zinc bioavailability.

Treatment
soil application of Zne0
Outcome
grain Zn bioavailabilitye0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of soil application of Zn on grain Zn bioavailability was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2030 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc methods and cultivars did not positively affect outer versus inner distribution patterns.

Outcome
distribution patterns of the three componentse0
Direction
have not positive effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application methods and cultivars have not positive effect on the distribution patterns of the three components between the outer and inner parts of wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2265–2428 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar zinc as economical and effective for grain zinc concentration and bioavailability.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn fertilizere0
Outcome
high Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of Zn fertilizer to wheat is the economical and effective method to attain high Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain especially for the endosperm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2476–2659 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.