Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation increased Timgalen wheat yield by 78%, equalling Clipper barley.

A claim from Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation increased Timgalen wheat yield by 78%, equalling Clipper barley.

Material
Timgalene0
Treatment
Fumigation of the soil with methyl bromidee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
barley cv. Clippere0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation of the soil with methyl bromide increased wheat cv. Timgalen yield by 78% to equal that of barley cv. Clipper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–739

Title

Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales

AD Doyle; RW McLeod; PTW Wong; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1987. doi:10.1071/ea9870563

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-ee71d607eca70cc32ff62b842b5e82c0e671b61fe9b1ab4305cff78804885b70 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

bromomethane · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

solarization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.