Intervention effectmodel-written summary

N uptake and physiological NUE were higher in the four yield-enhanced CRF treatments than in CCF.

A claim from Effects of Controlled-Release Fertiliser on Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Summer Maize · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake and physiological NUE were higher in the four yield-enhanced CRF treatments than in CCF.

Taxon
summer maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
four yield-enhanced CRF treatmentse6
Outcome
N uptake and physiological NUEe6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
CCFe6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in summer maize hybrid cultivar Zhengdan958”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–473
e6

“Agronomic NUE and apparent N recovery were higher in the CRF treatment than in the CCF treatment. The N uptake and physiological NUE of the four yield-enhanced CRF treatments were higher than those of CCF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1493

Title

Effects of Controlled-Release Fertiliser on Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Summer Maize

Bin Zhao; Shuting Dong; Jiwang Zhang; et al. PLoS ONE 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070569

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-eea98616d5bf39bc181bb1226dd2839215543b03351d1c3a3d6aa0ad47bc368c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.