Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bed planting used the least irrigation water, 1973 and 1983 m3fed.-1, versus basin planting at 45% depletion.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS AND PLANTING METHODS ON WHEAT YIELD AND IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting used the least irrigation water, 1973 and 1983 m3fed.-1, versus basin planting at 45% depletion.

Treatment
bed planting methode0
Outcome
irrigation water appliede0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1973 and 1983 m3fed.-1e0
Comparator
basin planting methode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bed planting method accomplished the lowest average values of irrigation water applied(1973 and 1983 m3fed.-1) and water consumptive use (1332 and 1335 m3fed.-1) while, the highest average values of irrigation water applied(2395 and 2409 m3fed.-1) and water consumptive use (1437 and 1442 m3fed.-1) were given with the basin planting method for soil moisture depletion of 45% in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1918
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS AND PLANTING METHODS ON WHEAT YIELD AND IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY

M. A. Metwally Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49770

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-eeadbc2f77d6fc53cee8abc2b6abf1644be8dcfa360e6fe748f388bcb60061e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.