Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 45% depletion increased grain yield by 15.3% versus 75%.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS AND PLANTING METHODS ON WHEAT YIELD AND IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 45% depletion increased grain yield by 15.3% versus 75%.

Treatment
irrigating the wheat crop at depletion 45% of available watere0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.3e0
Comparator
irrigating the wheat crop at depletion 75% of available watere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation (irrigating the wheat crop at depletion 45% of available water) increased wheat grain yield, water productivity and irrigation water productivity by 15.3, 10.4 and 8.8% compared to irrigating the wheat crop at depletion 75% of available water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2454–2716
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS AND PLANTING METHODS ON WHEAT YIELD AND IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY

M. A. Metwally Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49770

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-fb9590a78c7a6989655cfaeb80103a9dfdae89acec2d2ed3f21f4f63f8bd6529 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.