Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IBA at 4.0 or 6.0 g·liter –1 gave similar rooting percentages (58% and 69%) of two-node cuttings.

A claim from Rooting of Semi-hardwood ‘Hayward’ Kiwifruit Cuttings · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 4.0 or 6.0 g·liter –1 gave similar rooting percentages (58% and 69%) of two-node cuttings.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
IBA at 4.0 or 6.0 g·liter –1e4
Outcome
rooting percentagese4
Direction
similare4
Value
58% and 69%e4
Qualifier
two-node cuttingse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53
e4

“Treatment with IBA at 4.0 or 6.0 g·liter –1 resulted in similar rooting percentages (58% and 69%, respectively) of two-node cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–825

Title

Rooting of Semi-hardwood ‘Hayward’ Kiwifruit Cuttings

J. D. Caldwell; D. C. Coston; K. H. Brock HortScience 1988. doi:10.21273/hortsci.23.4.714

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-eecb27e0872b754452e0b87dc7e1fc59a5e38ead2df9bbe3237f41cffe84dfc9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.