Claim · model-written summary
The I 80 deficit irrigation treatment gave higher water use efficiency than I 100, by 5.63%.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- I 80e1
- Outcome
- WUEe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 5.63e1
- Comparator
- I 100e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic benefits of winter wheat”
e1“the I 80 treatment resulted in higher WUE and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) than those under I 100 by 5.63 and 13.52 %, respectively”
Title
Pengyan Zhang; Maodong Wang; Lianyu Yu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109093
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Aboveground dry matter, yield and net ecosystem economic budget of winter wheat showed increasing trends with increasing N application rates.
- Intervention effect Aboveground dry matter, yield and net ecosystem economic budget did not differ significantly between the N H and N M treatments.
- Intervention effect Water use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and N fertilizer recovery efficiency first increased then decreased with increasing N rates, peaking under the N M treatment.
- Intervention effect Biochar addition significantly increased winter wheat yield and water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect The I 80 deficit irrigation treatment gave higher irrigation water use efficiency than I 100, by 13.52%.
- Recommendation The combined I 80 B 1 N M treatment was the optimal winter wheat management practice by TOPSIS, maintaining high productivity while improving resource use efficiency and economic benefits.
- Intervention effect Biochar reduced irrigation deficit-induced yield loss in winter wheat.
- Intervention effect Reduced nitrogen improved resource utilization of winter wheat without significantly reducing yield.