Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Daye leaf RMP did not increase significantly.

A claim from A procedure for assessing the salt tolerance of lucerne ( Medicago sativa L.) cultivar seedlings by combining agronomic and physiological indicators · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Daye leaf RMP did not increase significantly.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Material
‘Daye’e0
Treatment
NaCle1
Outcome
RMPe0
Direction
neither the MDA content nor the RMP was significantly increasede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Daye’ was healthier because neither the MDA content nor the RMP was significantly increased in its leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1013
t0

“lucerne ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–77
e1

“NaCl reduced the shoot dry weight and shoot K + /Na + ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–470

Title

A procedure for assessing the salt tolerance of lucerne ( Medicago sativa L.) cultivar seedlings by combining agronomic and physiological indicators

Bao Ai‐Ke; Guo Zheng‐Gang; Zhang Hong‐Fei; et al. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 2009. doi:10.1080/00288230909510525

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ef1c71e8a6a2e65dd8ed5a13dbd8f8e753d5b0b0c59cdb3a0d7650b402daf027 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

sodium chloride · physiology: oxidative · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.