Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed yield was better on medium-productivity soil inhabited by high-effective rhizobial populations than on high-quality soil.

A claim from The Diversity of Pea Microsymbionts in Various Types of Soils and Their Effects on Plant Host Productivity · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was better on medium-productivity soil inhabited by high-effective rhizobial populations than on high-quality soil.

Treatment
soil with medium biological productivity inhabited by high-effective rhizobial populationse7
Interactor
rhizobial populationse7symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
bettere7
Comparator
soil with high agricultural qualitye7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of peas cultivated on eight different soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64
e7

“better seed yield was obtained for soil with medium biological productivity inhabited by high-effective rhizobial populations than for soil with high agricultural quality containing medium-quality pea microsymbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1393

Title

The Diversity of Pea Microsymbionts in Various Types of Soils and Their Effects on Plant Host Productivity

Jerzy Wielbo; Anna Podleśna; Dominika Kidaj; et al. Microbes and Environments 2015. doi:10.1264/jsme2.me14141

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-eff24871cf2bbee1587ef159cb8ea8f13f6c82b7e9a12ba77478f4f18b5ab206 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

in vitro · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.