Intervention effectmodel-written summary

DABCO, methionine, histidine, benzoate and formate did not inhibit chlorophyll a destruction.

A claim from Active oxygen participation in chlorophyll destruction and lipid peroxidation in SO2-fumigated leaves of spinach · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DABCO, methionine, histidine, benzoate and formate did not inhibit chlorophyll a destruction.

Treatment
DABCOe0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a destructione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not by l,4-diazabicyclo-[2,2,2]-octane (DABCO), methio-nine, histidine, benzoate and formate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–692
e1

“Chlorophyll a destruction was inhibited by l,2-dihydroxybenzene-3,5-disulfonate (tiron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–564
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–112

Title

Active oxygen participation in chlorophyll destruction and lipid peroxidation in SO2-fumigated leaves of spinach

Ken-ichiro Shimazaki; Takeshi Sakaki; Noriaki Kondo; et al. Plant and Cell Physiology 1980. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076095

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-f4843a4137f2294c1124b22fe1645c5cc523b73ff9668ee5724605e74ce9a6c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer