Intervention effectmodel-written summary

EDTA solubilized soil lead more efficiently than citric acid and sulfur.

A claim from Comparison of Organic and Inorganic Amendments for Enhancing Soil Lead Phytoextraction by Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA solubilized soil lead more efficiently than citric acid and sulfur.

Treatment
EDTAe0
Outcome
solubilizing lead (Pb) from the soile0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
CA and Se0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117
e0

“EDTA was more efficient than CA and S in solubilizing lead (Pb) from the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–573

Title

Comparison of Organic and Inorganic Amendments for Enhancing Soil Lead Phytoextraction by Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)

Saifullah; A. Ghafoor; M. H. Zia; et al. International Journal of Phytoremediation 2010. doi:10.1080/15226511003753953

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-fb2baed4d374d05b13ea4ffe2486c4b2900437adc653c9d2ad99c17807e7afae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.