Paper · 2025 · Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi

Impact of Fe-EDTA, EDTA, and Zn Applications on Fe and Zn Levels and Biomass Production in Bread Wheat

Faruk Özkutlu; Kürşat Korkmaz

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies, particularly of iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), are a persistent constraint to crop productivity and nutritional quality in calcareous soils with high pH. This study investigated the effects of EDTA (ethylene dinitrilo tetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate), Fe-EDTA in combination with different Zn fertilization rates on dry matter yield and tissue Fe and Zn status of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. BDME-10). A greenhouse experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments included Fe-EDTA applied at 0, 2, and 10 mg Fe kg-1, unchelated EDTA at 0, 13, and 65 mg kg-1, together with Zn sulfate at 0, 0.05, and 5 mg Zn kg-1. Both Fe and Zn fertilization enhanced biomass production and Fe and Zn concentrations. The greatest yield improvement, corresponding to a 43% increase compared with control, was obtained with 10 mg Fe kg-1 as Fe-EDTA in combination with 5 mg Zn kg-1. Zinc application also markedly increased Zn uptake, with Zn uptake rising from 1.61 µg plant-1 in the control plants to 37.26 µg plant-1 at the highest Zn dose. However, this increase in Zn dosage led to reductions in Fe concentration and uptake of up to 48%. In Fe-EDTA treatments, Fe uptake reached 76.94 µg plant-1 at moderate Zn supply but decreased to 56.62 µg plant-1 under excess Zn. EDTA, however, also increased both Fe and Zn uptake, yet its effectiveness remained consistently lower than that of Fe-EDTA under comparable conditions. These results demonstrate that Fe-EDTA is a more efficient, supporting higher Fe acquisition and Zn accumulation while reducing the severity of Zn–Fe antagonism. A balanced combination of Fe-EDTA and Zn supply therefore represents a promising approach to improve both yield and Fe and Zn content of wheat in calcareous soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe and Zn fertilization increased biomass and nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fe and Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomass production and Fe and Zn concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Fe and Zn fertilization enhanced biomass production and Fe and Zn concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined high Fe-EDTA and Zn treatment raised yield 43% over control.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
10 mg Fe kg-1 as Fe-EDTA in combination with 5 mg Zn kg-1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest yield improvement, corresponding to a 43% increase compared with control, was obtained with 10 mg Fe kg-1 as Fe-EDTA in combination with 5 mg Zn kg-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest Zn dose raised Zn uptake from 1.61 to 37.26 µg per plant.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
highest Zn dosee0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.26 µg plant-1e0
Qualifier
1.61 µg plant-1e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application also markedly increased Zn uptake, with Zn uptake rising from 1.61 µg plant-1 in the control plants to 37.26 µg plant-1 at the highest Zn dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Zn dosage reduced Fe concentration and uptake by up to 48%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in Zn dosagee0
Outcome
Fe concentration and uptakee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increase in Zn dosage led to reductions in Fe concentration and uptake of up to 48%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe uptake under Fe-EDTA fell from 76.94 at moderate Zn to 56.62 µg per plant at excess Zn.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excess Zne0
Outcome
Fe uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56.62 µg plant-1e0
Qualifier
76.94 µg plant-1e0
Comparator
moderate Zn supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Fe-EDTA treatments, Fe uptake reached 76.94 µg plant-1 at moderate Zn supply but decreased to 56.62 µg plant-1 under excess Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA increased Fe and Zn uptake less effectively than Fe-EDTA.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EDTAe0
Outcome
Fe and Zn uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Fe-EDTAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EDTA, however, also increased both Fe and Zn uptake, yet its effectiveness remained consistently lower than that of Fe-EDTA under comparable conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.