Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AM inoculation increased cowpea mycorrhizal infection relative to uninoculated plants.

A claim from Assessment of AM biotechnology in improving agricultural productivity of nutrient-deficient soil in the tropics · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation increased cowpea mycorrhizal infection relative to uninoculated plants.

Treatment
AM inoculatede0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
infectionse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated cowpea plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the AM inoculated plants had higher infections than the uninoculated cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–705

Title

Assessment of AM biotechnology in improving agricultural productivity of nutrient-deficient soil in the tropics

A. Olusola Salami Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 2006. doi:10.1080/03235400600587516

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-fc3b0bc021acddd0cbdc47ada5884ebe3db44941fffd911352bce6d2b2e478f1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 18 positive, 17 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.