Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fall application of 50 kg N ha −1 to no-till plots influenced neither the amount of wheat residue on the soil surface.

A claim from Wheat residue management options for no-till corn · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall application of 50 kg N ha −1 to no-till plots influenced neither the amount of wheat residue on the soil surface.

Treatment
application of 50 kg N ha −1 in the fall to NT (not baled) plotse6
Outcome
amount of wheat residue on the soil surfacee6
Direction
neithere6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn (Zea mays L.) yield reduction following winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in no-till systems prompted a study on the effects of tillage and residue management systems on corn growth and seedbed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–211
e6

“The application of 50 kg N ha −1 in the fall to NT (not baled) plots influenced neither the amount of wheat residue on the soil surface, nor the soil NO 3 -N levels at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1615

Title

Wheat residue management options for no-till corn

G. Opoku; T. J. Vyn Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1997. doi:10.4141/p96-128

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-fd702807f706ef3c519a977b3b55f5995feacef9ad91e4b6763c343acd9c1fc5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

tillage · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 27 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.