Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring ammonium nitrate fertilizing by scattering on thawed/frozen soil was less efficient, with a productivity increase from 0.21 t/ha after peas to 0.65 t/ha after maize.

A claim from The choice of the terms and methods of nitrogen additional fertilizing for winter bread wheat in the southern part of the Rostov region · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring ammonium nitrate fertilizing by scattering on thawed/frozen soil was less efficient, with a productivity increase from 0.21 t/ha after peas to 0.65 t/ha after maize.

Taxon
winter bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium nitrate fertilizing by the scattering method in the spring on thawed/frozen soile0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.21 t/ha sown after peas to 0.65 t/ha sown after maizee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93
e0

“ammonium nitrate fertilizing by the scattering method in the spring on thawed/frozen soil was lower, the productivity increase ranged from 0.21 t/ha sown after peas to 0.65 t/ha sown after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1290

Title

The choice of the terms and methods of nitrogen additional fertilizing for winter bread wheat in the southern part of the Rostov region

A. A. Sukharev; G. M. Zelenskaya Grain Economy of Russia 2020. doi:10.31367/2079-8725-2020-69-3-43-47

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-fd955ee7ae1fe6bf0e85eefb6616112627cbe5769cfae870edcd14b8ac612d25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 49 positive, 5 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.