Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation 15 days before sowing gave 30.0% less plant stand than irrigation seven days before sowing.

A claim from Effect of irrigation and biofertilizer on water use, nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation 15 days before sowing gave 30.0% less plant stand than irrigation seven days before sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
irrigation at 15 DBSe0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
lesse0
Value
30.0%e0
Comparator
irrigation applied 7 DBSe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-sowing irrigation at 15 DBS showed 28.7 and 30.0% less plant stand than irrigation applied 15 DBS + straw mulch and irrigation applied 7 DBS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–654
e1

“chickpea growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–365

Title

Effect of irrigation and biofertilizer on water use, nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)

Guriqbal Singh; H. S. Sekhon; Poonam Sharma Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2011. doi:10.1080/03650340.2010.493880

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-fdcacfd9da5cd37a6c35b8bb2de40595275ab0168c8af6c1f483416e1f7ea595 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.