Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Unshaded irrigated chickpea plants produced the highest dry matter production, 838 g/m 2, about twice that of shaded unirrigated plants.

A claim from Effect of light and soil moisture on yield, yield components, and abortion of reproductive structures of chickpea ( Cicerarietinum) , in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshaded irrigated chickpea plants produced the highest dry matter production, 838 g/m 2, about twice that of shaded unirrigated plants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
unshaded irrigated plantse1
Outcome
dry matter (DM) productione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
838 g/m 2e1
Comparator
shaded unirrigated plantse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in 1994–95 to test the effects of soil moisture (two levels, nil and fully irrigated) and shade (two levels, full light and 40% shaded) on the abortion of reproductive structures, yield, and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–277
e1

“Shade and soil moisture interacted significantly, and the highest dry matter (DM) production of 838 g/m 2 was produced by unshaded irrigated plants. This was about twice the DM produced by shaded unirrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–493

Title

Effect of light and soil moisture on yield, yield components, and abortion of reproductive structures of chickpea ( Cicerarietinum) , in Canterbury, New Zealand

T. I. Verghis; B. A. McKenzie; G. D. Hill New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 1999. doi:10.1080/01140671.1999.9514091

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d0b3a8bbe3b6fbf07ae34d4526fd73f2cdfe4f552f906928c8d5196f90bfa60d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.