Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The authors concluded that tillage and gypsum increased maize production with minimum irrigation water.

A claim from Agricultural practices for maize crop water production under pivot irrigation in Toshka, Egypt · 2023

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that tillage and gypsum increased maize production with minimum irrigation water.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tillage practices and gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
maize productione0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
minimum irrigation water applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage practices and gypsum application enhanced soil properties whether physical or chemical and increased soil fertility as well as realized high maize production with minimum irrigation water application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1743

Title

Agricultural practices for maize crop water production under pivot irrigation in Toshka, Egypt

M. M. El-Sayed; A. H. Amin; A. S. A. Abdel-Mawgoud Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal/Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal 2023. doi:10.21608/aasj.2023.358374

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-fe254a8df926cecaa6212c730d5b545bbc3282e27adc7761a82148b7936a5c5a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Lime and PG additions had no long-term effect on maize yield.

    Lime and phosphogypsum application and sulfate retention in subtropical soils under no-till system · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Fertilization without lime significantly decreased soil pH and crop yield relative to fertilization with lime in 2012–2018.

    Interaction of liming and long-term fertilization increased crop yield and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) through mediating exchangeable cations in acidic soil under wheat–maize cropping system · 2020 · compared with fertilizer with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Maize yields showed no statistically confirmed difference between the 10 and 15 t/ha dolomite treatments.

    IMPACTS OF LIMING BY DOLOMITE ON THE MAIZE AND BARLEY GRAIN YIELDS · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Maize grain yield did not respond to lime application.

    Yield-limiting plant nutrients for maize production in northwest Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Liming had no clear effect on soil K, maize leaf N, Cu, Fe and Zn, or on maize grain yield.

    Effects of liming and inorganic fertiliser application on soil properties and maize growth and yield in rural agriculture in the Mbizana area, Eastern Cape province, South Africa · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Corn yield did not vary with lime rates.

    Liming and electrochemical attributes of an oxisol under no tillage · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Liming negatively affected shoot and root dry matter production of maize.

    Ammonium Fertilization Enhances Nutrient Uptake, Specifically Manganese and Zinc, and Growth of Maize in Unlimed and Limed Acidic Sandy Soil · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Lime and micronutrients did not alleviate the affected yield.

    Tillage and Fertilization of Corn Grown on Lespedeza Sod1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

210 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    No-tillage without red clover reduced corn grain yield by 13% versus conventional tillage over three years.

    Red Clover and Tillage Influence on Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Corn Emergence · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage treatment

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    A significant tillage x year interaction indicated equal continuous corn yields for CT and NT in the first 2 years.

    Corn Production as Affected by Tillage System and Starter Fertilizer · 2002 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Soil compaction markedly reduced corn growth and yield.

    Soil Compaction in the Field and Corn Growth1 · 1962

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.