Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cycocel plus Folicur gave significantly higher grain yield and harvest index.

A claim from Effect of nutrient management and growth retardants on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth attributes and productivity · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel plus Folicur gave significantly higher grain yield and harvest index.

Treatment
Cycocel + Folicure0
Outcome
grain yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Cycocel + Folicur resulted in significantly higher grain yield and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–798
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60

Title

Effect of nutrient management and growth retardants on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth attributes and productivity

Rachana Patel; SK Thakral; Sanju Dudi International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ff88f20fac3b35eb90584dfe432130749867eccc4c683e406e4b35a5106491b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Chlormequat and paclobutrazol did not affect wheat grain yield.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    CCC did not affect yield.

    Response of Five Winter Wheat Cultivars to Growth Regulators and Increased Nitrogen1 · 1986

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Chlormequat left seed yields unchanged.

    EFFECTS OF CHLORMEQUAT ON PLANT HEIGHT, DISEASE DEVELOPMENT AND CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF CULTIVARS OF BARLEY, OATS, AND WHEAT · 1977

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    CCC applied at ZGS 31-32 reduced wheat grain yield by 480 kg ha-1.

    Timing applications of growth regulators to alter spring cereal development at high latitudes · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    In the nonlodging year, CCC yield was similar to the check, at 6.60 versus 6.39 Mg ha −1.

    Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat as Influenced by Chlormequat Chloride and Ethephon · 1989 · compared with check

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Chlormequat did not significantly affect shoot number, crop dry weight, or grain yield in either cereal.

    A comparison of the root and shoot growth of winter barley and winter wheat, and the effect of an early application of chlormequat · 1984

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    On average the dwarfing compound CCC had no effect on spring wheat grain yields.

    Woburn irrigation, 1960–8:VI. Results for rotation crops · 1970

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Cycocel decreased wheat yield where lodging was absent.

    EFFECTS OF CYCOCEL (CCC) AND FUNGICIDE SPRAYS ON SPRING WHEAT GROWN AT THREE NITROGEN LEVELS · 1979

    Opposite direction

62 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.