Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Halving seed rate increased wheat yield by 8·3 cwt. in nitrogen-deficient plots.

A claim from Effects of nitrogen applied at different dates, and of other cultural treatments on eyespot, take-all and yield of winter wheat (field experiment, 1953) · 1957

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving seed rate increased wheat yield by 8·3 cwt. in nitrogen-deficient plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Halving the seed ratee1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8·3 cwt.e0
Qualifier
nitrogendeficient plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield by amounts ranging from 8·3 cwt. in nitrogendeficient plots to 2·6 cwt./acre in plots well supplied with ammonium sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–905
e1

“Halving the seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–649
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127

Title

Effects of nitrogen applied at different dates, and of other cultural treatments on eyespot, take-all and yield of winter wheat (field experiment, 1953)

G. A. Salt The Journal of Agricultural Science 1957. doi:10.1017/s0021859600031695

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ff8b4bf6e04602ae330a837a1ea0c66a5fd967b5773bc332a89692eed65c1f8e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.