Thymelicus lineola 17 claims

species · family Hesperiidae · animal · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Common name: European skipper

Thymelicus lineolaCharles J. Sharp · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

17 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: carbaryle0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: carbofurane0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: methomyle0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: permethrine0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: trichlorfone0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: Dipel 45Be0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: Dipel WPe0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: Thuricide 26Be0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: Thuricide HPCe0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novabac 3 gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.

Taxon: Thymelicus lineolaThymelicus lineolae5
Treatment: Novabac 3e0
Outcome: controle0
Direction: Satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Satisfactory control was obtained with carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, permethrin, trichlorfon, Dipel 45B(=Dipel SC), Dipel WP, Thuricide 26B, Thuricide HPC, and Novabac 3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–420

e5
“against the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–215

Title

FIELD EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF THE EUROPEAN SKIPPER, THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Michel Letendre; Jeremy N. McNeil The Canadian Entomologist 1979. doi:10.4039/ent1111313-12

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Carbaryl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Carbofuran gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Methomyl gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Permethrin gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Trichlorfon gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel 45B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dipel WP gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide 26B gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Thuricide HPC gave satisfactory control of Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Dimethoate afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Chlorpyrifos afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Diatom dusts afforded little or no foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola.
Intervention effect Larval mortality occurred less rapidly after Bacillus thuringiensis preparations were applied.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations afford the same degree of foliage protection against Thymelicus lineola as chemical insecticides.
Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis preparations may diminish possible undesirable off-target effects of control.
Recommendation The authors strongly recommend the use of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against Thymelicus lineola.