By organism › Animals › Tephritidae › Bactrocera dorsalis

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactrocera dorsalis had high abundance of 265.64 ± 132.82 individuals.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise0
Outcome: abundancee0
Direction: highe0
Value: (265.64 ± 132.82) individualse0

Verbatim

e0
“a high abundance of Bactrocera dorsalis ((265.64 ± 132.82) individuals)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–950

Title

Influence of Different Mango Phenological Stages on Fruit Fly Populations in Mango Orchards in Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Charles Konan Kouakou; Adama Coulibaly; Fougnigue Edwige Yeo; et al. Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.4236/as.2024.1511071

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactrocera dorsalis abundance was high at maturity, at 129.20 ± 46.15 individuals.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise0
Organ / stage: maturity stagee0
Outcome: abundancee0
Direction: highe0
Value: (129.20 ± 46.15) individualse0

Verbatim

e0
“Fruit flies were most abundant at the maturity stage, with a high abundance of Bactrocera dorsalis species ((129.20 ± 46.15) individuals)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1141

Title

Influence of Different Mango Phenological Stages on Fruit Fly Populations in Mango Orchards in Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Charles Konan Kouakou; Adama Coulibaly; Fougnigue Edwige Yeo; et al. Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.4236/as.2024.1511071

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactrocera dorsalis abundance was high at the vegetative stage, at 597.80 ± 214.07 individuals.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise0
Organ / stage: vegetative stagee0
Outcome: abundancee0
Direction: highe0
Value: (597.80 ± 214.07) individualse0

Verbatim

e0
“a high abundance of Bactrocera dorsalis species ((129.20 ± 46.15) individuals) and at the vegetative stage ((597.80 ± 214.07) individuals)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1201

Title

Influence of Different Mango Phenological Stages on Fruit Fly Populations in Mango Orchards in Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Charles Konan Kouakou; Adama Coulibaly; Fougnigue Edwige Yeo; et al. Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.4236/as.2024.1511071

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. dorsalis was captured at seven flies per trap per week.

Taxon: B. dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise0
Outcome: fruit flies/trap/weeke0
Value: 7 fruit flies/trap/weeke0

Verbatim

e0
“B. dorsalis (7 fruit flies/trap/week)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1601

Title

Evaluation of different traps and lures combinations for monitoring and eco-friendly management of fruit fly (Bactrocera Spp) in peach orchards

Fazal Maula; Aftab Ahmad Khan; Arshad Ali; et al. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2022. doi:10.22271/j.ento.2022.v10.i1b.8923

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Cylindrical bottle traps captured the most fruit flies among trap types, at 155 per trap per week.
Observation Fruition NOVA® traps captured 34 fruit flies per trap per week.
Observation Yellow sticky traps captured 12 fruit flies per trap per week.
Intervention effect Methyl eugenol captured the most fruit flies among lures, at 134 per trap per week.
Observation Methyl eugenol plus Cue lure captured 95 fruit flies per trap per week.
Observation Fruition lure captured 26 fruit flies per trap per lure.
Observation Cue lure captured 14 fruit flies per trap per week.
Intervention effect Cylindrical bottle traps with Methyl eugenol captured the most fruit flies among trap and lure combinations, at 321 per trap per week.
Intervention effect Yellow sticky traps with Cue lure captured the fewest fruit flies, at 10 per trap per week.
Observation B. zonata was the most abundant trapped species, at 80 flies per trap per week.
Observation B. invadense was captured at 45 flies per trap per week.
Observation B. cucurbitae was captured at one fly per trap per week.
Observation B. tau was captured at one fly per trap per week.
Observation Fruit fly trapping peaked in July 2021 and was lowest in June and September 2021.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: neem oil-treated fruite0
Outcome: number of landings and time spent on treated fruite0
Direction: samee0
Comparator: controle0
Setting: laboratorye0

Verbatim

e0
“In the laboratory, neem oil-treated fruit had the same number of landings and time spent on treated fruit as the control but showed reduced pupal development.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–554

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.
Intervention effect Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: neem oil-treated fruite0
Outcome: pupal developmente0
Direction: reducede0
Comparator: controle0
Setting: laboratorye0

Verbatim

e0
“In the laboratory, neem oil-treated fruit had the same number of landings and time spent on treated fruit as the control but showed reduced pupal development.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–554

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.
Intervention effect Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.
Intervention effect Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: kaolin-treated fruitse0
Outcome: landinge0
Direction: less oftene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Females selected kaolin-treated fruits for landing less often, with reduced pupal development.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–649

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.
Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: kaolin-treated fruitse0
Outcome: pupal developmente0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Females selected kaolin-treated fruits for landing less often, with reduced pupal development.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–649

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.
Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.
Intervention effect Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: neem cakee0
Outcome: pupal survivale0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Soil treatment with neem cake and neem seed powder reduced pupal survival.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–724

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.
Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.
Intervention effect Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil neem seed powder treatment reduced pupal survival.

Taxon: Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalist0
Treatment: neem seed powdere0
Outcome: pupal survivale0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Soil treatment with neem cake and neem seed powder reduced pupal survival.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–724

t0
“Bactrocera dorsalis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Foliar, Fruit, and Soil-Applied Organic Insecticides for Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Senegalese Mangoes

Assa Balayara; Carlyle C. Brewster; Larry J. Vaughan; et al. Plant Health Progress 2019. doi:10.1094/php-10-18-0061-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment did not change fruit landings or time spent on fruit.
Intervention effect Laboratory neem oil treatment reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Females landed less often on kaolin-treated fruits.
Intervention effect Kaolin-treated fruits reduced pupal development.
Intervention effect Soil neem cake treatment reduced pupal survival.
Intervention effect Field neem treatment increased infested fruit numbers and pupal development relative to control.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged under field neem treatment.
Intervention effect Kaolin did not differ from control in infested fruit percentage or pupal development.
Intervention effect Fewer flies emerged with kaolin than control.
Intervention effect Neem cake lost efficacy in the field.
Intervention effect Neem seed powder lost efficacy in the field.

Bactrocera dorsalis 26 claims

26 claims