Hebeloma mesophaeum 5 claims

species · family Hymenogastraceae · fungus · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

NCBI synonyms: Agaricus fastibilis var. mesophaeus · Hebeloma gregarium

2 spellings

Hebeloma mesophaeum
Hebeloma mesophaeumJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An OTU from Burkholderiaceae was prominent with H. mesophaeum.

Taxon
Pinus montezumaePinus montezumaet0
Interactor
H. mesophaeumHebeloma mesophaeume0symbionte1
Outcome
an OTU from Burkholderiaceae was prominente0

Verbatim

e0

“with H. mesophaeum an OTU from Burkholderiaceae was prominent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1138
e1

“Pinus montezumae inoculated with Laccaria laccata and Hebeloma mesophaeum, applied alone or co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–431
t0

“Pinus montezumae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–71

Title

Bacterial community structure associated with roots of Pinus montezumae Lamb. inoculated with edible ectomycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhizal helper bacteria

José David Álvarez-Solís; Departamento de Agricultura, Sociedad y Ambiente, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, México; María del Rosario Cardoso-Villanueva; et al. Mexican Journal of Biotechnology 2024. doi:10.29267/mxjb.2024.9.3.1

Other claims from this paper (7)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors present inoculation with Helvella cf. lacunosa and Hebeloma mesophaeum as important for nursery production.

Taxon
P. ayacahuitePinus ayacahuitee0
Interactor
Helvella cf. lacunosaHelvella cf. lacunosae0symbiont
Second interactor
Hebeloma mesophaeumHebeloma mesophaeume0symbiont
Outcome
inoculation with Helvella cf. lacunosa and Hebeloma mesophaeum for the productione0

Verbatim

e0

“Our work also demonstrates the importance of inoculation with Helvella cf. lacunosa and Hebeloma mesophaeum for the production of P. ayacahuite plants in nurseries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1370

Title

Ectomycorrhizal inoculation with edible fungi increases plant growth and nutrient contents of Pinus ayacahuite

Cristina Arteaga-León; Jesús Pérez-Moreno; David Espinosa-Victoria; et al. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 2018. doi:10.22201/ib.20078706e.2018.4.2235

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hebeloma mesophaeum and Rhizopogon roseolus were found in both nurseries and plantations.

Taxon
Pinus ponderosaPinus ponderosat0
Interactor
Hebeloma mesophaeumHebeloma mesophaeume3symbiont
Second interactor
Rhizopogon roseolusRhizopogon roseoluse3symbiont
Outcome
found in nurseries and plantationse3
Qualifier
Suillus luteus, Tomentella atramentaria and Amphinema byssoidese3
Setting
nurseries and plantationse3

Verbatim

t0

“Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80
e3

“Hebeloma mesophaeum, Rhizopogon roseolus, Suillus luteus, Tomentella atramentaria and Amphinema byssoides were found in nurseries and plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–745

Title

Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)

Carolina Barroetaveña; Mario Cázares Rajchenberg Nova Hedwigia 2005. doi:10.1127/0029-5035/2005/0080-0453

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amphinema byssoides and Hebeloma mesophaeum were the most widely distributed species in plantations.

Taxon
Pinus ponderosaPinus ponderosat0
Interactor
Amphinema byssoidesAmphinema byssoidese5symbiont
Second interactor
Hebeloma mesophaeumHebeloma mesophaeume5symbiont
Outcome
most widely distributede5
Qualifier
Suillus luteus and Rhizopogon roseoluse5
Setting
plantationse5

Verbatim

t0

“Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80
e5

“The most widely distributed species were Amphinema byssoides, Hebeloma mesophaeum, Suillus luteus and Rhizopogon roseolus in plantations, and R. roseolus and H. mesophaeum in nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1046

Title

Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)

Carolina Barroetaveña; Mario Cázares Rajchenberg Nova Hedwigia 2005. doi:10.1127/0029-5035/2005/0080-0453

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopogon roseolus and Hebeloma mesophaeum were the most widely distributed species in nurseries.

Taxon
Pinus ponderosaPinus ponderosat0
Interactor
R. roseolusRhizopogon roseoluse5symbiont
Second interactor
H. mesophaeumHebeloma mesophaeume5symbiont
Outcome
most widely distributede5
Setting
nurseriese5

Verbatim

t0

“Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80
e5

“The most widely distributed species were Amphinema byssoides, Hebeloma mesophaeum, Suillus luteus and Rhizopogon roseolus in plantations, and R. roseolus and H. mesophaeum in nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1046

Title

Mycorrhizal fungi in Pinus ponderosa introduced in Central Patagonia (Argentina)

Carolina Barroetaveña; Mario Cázares Rajchenberg Nova Hedwigia 2005. doi:10.1127/0029-5035/2005/0080-0453

Other claims from this paper (6)