Claim · model-written summary
Electrical weed control with one application gave 39% control of Cirsium arvense in Corvallis.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“Cirsium arvense management with electrical weed control and clopyralid”
e1“In Corvallis, EWC provided 39% and 53% control with one and two applications, respectively”
Title
Cirsium arvense management with electrical weed control and clopyralid
Luisa Carolina Baccin; Marcelo L. Moretti Pest Management Science 2026. doi:10.1002/ps.70736
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Electrical weed control with two applications gave 53% control of Cirsium arvense in Corvallis.
- Intervention effect In Canby, control of Cirsium arvense increased to 38% with a single electrical weed control application.
- Intervention effect In Canby, control of Cirsium arvense increased to 94% with two electrical weed control applications.
- Intervention effect Clopyralid with a single application gave 96% control of Cirsium arvense in Corvallis.
- Intervention effect Clopyralid with two applications gave 95% control of Cirsium arvense in Corvallis.
- Intervention effect Clopyralid gave 43% control of Cirsium arvense in Canby.
- Intervention effect Clopyralid gave 78% control of Cirsium arvense in Canby.
- Intervention effect Two electrical weed control applications reduced Cirsium arvense shoot biomass by 95% in Canby.
- Intervention effect EWC followed by clopyralid gave 89% control of Cirsium arvense in Corvallis.
- Intervention effect EWC followed by clopyralid gave 87% control of Cirsium arvense in Canby.
- Intervention effect The reverse sequence gave 98% control of Cirsium arvense.
- Intervention effect Electrical weed control gave only transient control of Cirsium arvense.
- Intervention effect Integration with clopyralid improved control of Cirsium arvense.
