Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 2 claims

species · family Sporidiobolaceae · fungus · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

NCBI synonyms: Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (A. Jorg.) F.C. Harrison, 1928 · Rhodotorula mucilaginosa var. mucilaginosa · Rhodotorula mucilaginosa var. plicata · Rhodotorula pilimanae · Saccharomyces ruber · Torula mucilaginosa

Rhodotorula mucilaginosaA doubt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

2 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Y1 was identified as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa.

Taxon: Rhodotorula mucilaginosaRhodotorula mucilaginosae0
Material: Y1e0
Outcome: identified as Rhodotorula mucilaginosae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Y1 and Y8 isolates were identified as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Candida albicans, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–632

Title

Effect of Antigonistic yeast on penetration and biology of Meloidogyne incognita in Tomato

G. Vyshali; G. Jothi; K. Poornima Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2019. doi:10.5958/0974-0163.2019.00086.7

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Y1 was more effective than Y8 against nematode penetration.
Intervention effect Y1 delayed nematode penetration of tomato roots.
Intervention effect Y1 reduced adult female nematodes relative to untreated plants.
Intervention effect Y1 reduced nematode egg mass production relative to untreated plants.
Observation Nematode eggs were deformed and colonized by yeast cells.
Observation Y8 was identified as Candida albicans.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR-RAPD identified Rhodotorula mucilaginosa.

Taxon: Rhodotorula mucilaginosaRhodotorula mucilaginosae0
Outcome: identified by PCR-RAPDe0

Verbatim

e0
“The Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Rhodotorula minuta, Pichia kluyveri, Hanseniaspora uvarum and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa were identified by PCR-RAPD.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1809

Title

Comparison of the yeast microbiota of different varieties of cool-climate grapes by PCR-RAPD

Iwona Drożdż; Małgorzata Makarewicz; Paweł Sroka; et al. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences 2015. doi:10.5219/484

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Eighty-four yeast cultures were isolated from the tested grapes.
Method / resource Standard preliminary yeast identification differed greatly from molecular identification.
Observation Yeasts dominated the isolated microorganisms.
Observation Bacteria were also present among the isolated grape microorganisms.
Observation Molds were also present among the isolated grape microorganisms.
Method / resource PCR-RAPD identified most yeast strains.
Observation White and red grape varieties had very similar yeast microflora with the same species identified.
Observation Saccharomyces yeasts occurred in all grape varieties.
Observation PCR-RAPD identified Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Observation PCR-RAPD identified Metschnikowia pulcherrima.
Observation PCR-RAPD identified Rhodotorula minuta.
Observation PCR-RAPD identified Pichia kluyveri.
Observation PCR-RAPD identified Hanseniaspora uvarum; the abstract later says this was the only species identified by PCR-RAPD.
Method / resource PCR-RFLP identified four of 33 tested yeast strains.