Golovinomyces cichoracearum 21 claims

species · family Erysiphaceae · fungus · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Also written in claims: Erysiphe cichoracearum · E. cichoracearum · Erysiphe cichoracearum DC — NCBI synonyms: Erysiphe cichoracearum · Golovinomyces cichoracearum (DC.) Heluta, 1988

5 spellings

Golovinomyces cichoracearum
Golovinomyces cichoracearumJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GcEC10 localized in the plant cytosol and nucleus.

Taxon
Golovinomyces cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Gene
GcEC10e0
Outcome
localized in the plant cytosol and nucleuse0

Verbatim

e0

“GcEC10 is characterized as an RNase-like protein and is localized in the plant cytosol and nucleus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2145
t0

“Golovinomyces cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136

Title

Identification and Characterization of Effector Proteins and Genomic Analysis of the Cucurbit Powdery Mildew Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Kate Elizabeth Scheibel eScholarship (California Digital Library) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GcEc17 localized in the plant nucleus and cytosol.

Taxon
Golovinomyces cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Gene
GcEc17e0
Outcome
localized in the plant nucleus and cytosole0

Verbatim

e0

“GcEc17 is localized in the plant nucleus and cytosol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3118–3170
t0

“Golovinomyces cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136

Title

Identification and Characterization of Effector Proteins and Genomic Analysis of the Cucurbit Powdery Mildew Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Kate Elizabeth Scheibel eScholarship (California Digital Library) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient plasmid transformation of G. cichoracearum was unsuccessful.

Taxon
Golovinomyces cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Outcome
unsuccessfule0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Our efforts were unsuccessful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3739–3768
t0

“Golovinomyces cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136

Title

Identification and Characterization of Effector Proteins and Genomic Analysis of the Cucurbit Powdery Mildew Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Kate Elizabeth Scheibel eScholarship (California Digital Library) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A method yielded high molecular weight G. cichoracearum genomic DNA suitable for long-read sequencing.

Taxon
G. cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearume0
Outcome
high molecular weight genomic DNAe0
Qualifier
suitable for Pacific Biosciences Single Molecule Long-Read Sequencinge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“purification of high molecular weight genomic DNA from G. cichoracearum suitable for Pacific Biosciences Single Molecule Long-Read Sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3931–4072

Title

Identification and Characterization of Effector Proteins and Genomic Analysis of the Cucurbit Powdery Mildew Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Kate Elizabeth Scheibel eScholarship (California Digital Library) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highly susceptible sunflower hybrid carried larger conidia.

Taxon
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Material
highly susceptible hybride0
Outcome
higher sized conidiae0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“The highly susceptible hybrid recorded higher sized conidia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–413
t0

“Erysiphe cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–39

Title

Conidial size of Erysiphe cichoracearum as influenced by the host in sunflower

K. Karuna; Y. G. Shadakshari; K. S. Jagadish; et al. Plant Disease Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The resistant sunflower hybrid had the smallest conidial dimensions.

Taxon
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Material
resistant hybride0
Outcome
conidial dimensionse0
Direction
leaste0

Verbatim

e0

“the resistant hybrid recorded significantly least conidial dimensions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–491
t0

“Erysiphe cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–39

Title

Conidial size of Erysiphe cichoracearum as influenced by the host in sunflower

K. Karuna; Y. G. Shadakshari; K. S. Jagadish; et al. Plant Disease Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial length ranged from 23.53 to 32.17 μm among sunflower hybrids.

Taxon
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Outcome
length of the conidiae0
Value
23.53 μm to 32.17 μme0

Verbatim

e0

“the length of the conidia ranged from 23.53 μm to 32.17 μm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–679
t0

“Erysiphe cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–39

Title

Conidial size of Erysiphe cichoracearum as influenced by the host in sunflower

K. Karuna; Y. G. Shadakshari; K. S. Jagadish; et al. Plant Disease Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial breadth ranged from 13.93 to 17.95 μm.

Taxon
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearumt0
Outcome
breadthe0
Value
13.93 μm to 17.95 μme0

Verbatim

e0

“the breadth ranged from 13.93 μm to 17.95 μm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–728
t0

“Erysiphe cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–39

Title

Conidial size of Erysiphe cichoracearum as influenced by the host in sunflower

K. Karuna; Y. G. Shadakshari; K. S. Jagadish; et al. Plant Disease Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Te-0 allowed conidial germination and functional haustoria but did not support mature conidiophores.

Taxon
G. cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearume1
Material
Te-0e0
Interactor
Te-0e1host
Outcome
germination of conidia and development of functional haustoriae0
Qualifier
could not support the formation of mature conidiophorese0

Verbatim

e0

“Te-0 plants allowed germination of conidia and development of functional haustoria, but could not support the formation of mature conidiophores.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1368
e1

“the interaction of G. cichoracearum with Te-0 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1066

Title

Loss of compatibility might explain resistance of the Arabidopsis thaliana accession Te-0 to Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Georgina Fabro; María Elena Alvarez BMC Plant Biology 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-143

Other claims from this paper (5)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidiophore formation is the main constraint on completion of the fungal life cycle in Te-0.

Taxon
G. cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearume1
Interactor
Te-0e1host
Outcome
completion of fungal life cyclee0
Qualifier
Conidiophores formation is the main constrainte0

Verbatim

e0

“Conidiophores formation is the main constraint for completion of fungal life cycle in Te-0 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1793
e1

“the interaction of G. cichoracearum with Te-0 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1066

Title

Loss of compatibility might explain resistance of the Arabidopsis thaliana accession Te-0 to Golovinomyces cichoracearum

Georgina Fabro; María Elena Alvarez BMC Plant Biology 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-143

Other claims from this paper (5)