Paper · 1982

Yields of bajra and wheat with saline waters applied through sprinkler and surface irrigation methods

M. C. Agarwal; Rukam Singh; S. K. Varma; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during the kharif [monsoon] and rabi [winter] seasons of 1975-8 to study the effects of saline water applied by sprinkler and surface methods of irrigation on the performance of bajra [Pennisetum americanum] and wheat crops and salt accumulation in soil. Saline water of 11 mmho/cm EC applied by sprinkler reduced bajra yield by 33%, but that of wheat by only 3%. Saline water up to 6 mmho/cm EC was safe for bajra if applied by sprinkler in late evening or at night. The marked reduction in bajra yield with application of 11 mmho/cm EC water by sprinkler was mainly due to burning of leaves caused by excessive Na content in the water. This water did not cause damage to the same extent to wheat because of lower temp. and higher RH prevailing in the rabi season than in the kharif season. In sprinkler irrigated plots, the salt accumulation in the soil profile (0-120 cm) was 30-40% less than with surface irrigation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler application of 11 mmho/cm saline water reduced bajra yield by 33%.

Taxon
bajrae0
Treatment
Saline water of 11 mmho/cm EC applied by sprinklere0
Outcome
bajra yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saline water of 11 mmho/cm EC applied by sprinkler reduced bajra yield by 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same saline water reduced wheat yield by only 3%.

Treatment
Saline water of 11 mmho/cm EC applied by sprinklere0
Outcome
that of wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saline water of 11 mmho/cm EC applied by sprinkler reduced bajra yield by 33%, but that of wheat by only 3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water up to 6 mmho/cm EC was safe for bajra with late evening or night sprinkler irrigation.

Taxon
bajrae0
Treatment
Saline water up to 6 mmho/cm ECe0
Outcome
safe for bajrae0
Qualifier
if applied by sprinkler in late evening or at nighte0

Verbatim

e0

“Saline water up to 6 mmho/cm EC was safe for bajra if applied by sprinkler in late evening or at night.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–500 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bajra yield reduction was attributed mainly to leaf burning from excessive sodium.

Taxon
bajrae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
11 mmho/cm EC water by sprinklere0
Compound
Nae0
Outcome
reduction in bajra yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The marked reduction in bajra yield with application of 11 mmho/cm EC water by sprinkler was mainly due to burning of leaves caused by excessive Na content in the water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–670 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat suffered less damage from this water because of cooler, more humid winter conditions.

Outcome
damagee0
Qualifier
lower temp. and higher RH prevailing in the rabi seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This water did not cause damage to the same extent to wheat because of lower temp. and higher RH prevailing in the rabi season than in the kharif season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salt accumulation was 30–40% lower under sprinkler than surface irrigation.

Taxon
bajra and wheatt0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigated plotse0
Outcome
salt accumulation in the soil profilee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
30-40%e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“In sprinkler irrigated plots, the salt accumulation in the soil profile (0-120 cm) was 30-40% less than with surface irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“bajra and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑

salinity · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.