Paper · 1995 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Water and nitrogen needs of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in sodic soil

Ashok Kumar; D. K. Sharma; H C Sharma

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1990-91 and 1991·-92 to evaluate the effect of irrigation and nitrogen on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) grown on sodic soil. Frequent irrigation at 1.2 irrigation water depth; cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio (IW ≈ 50 mm) with 180 kg N/ha gave the highest grain yield of wheat (4 091 kg/ha). The rate of water use per day increased with advance in age, reaching the peak value of 3.58 mm/day during 60-90 days and was higher in irrigated crop (4.97 mm/day) under 1.2IW : CPE ratio than in the unirrigated (1.89 mm/day). More moisture was extracted from deeper layer (60-120 cm) under unirrigated condition than under irrigated condition. N application increased the moisture depletion from 0-60 cm Soil depth. The nitrate-nitrogen content of the soil was more under unirrigated condition than under irrigated one .It decreased with increase in irrigation frequency, but increased with higher level of N. At harvest it was higher in 15-30 cm than in 0-15 cm soil layer under 0.9 and 1.2 IW : CPE ratios

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE with 180 kg N/ha gave the highest wheat grain yield, 4 091 kg/ha.

Treatment
Frequent irrigation at 1.2 irrigation water depth; cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio (IW ≈ 50 mm) with 180 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4 091 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frequent irrigation at 1.2 irrigation water depth; cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio (IW ≈ 50 mm) with 180 kg N/ha gave the highest grain yield of wheat (4 091 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily water use peaked at 3.58 mm/day during 60-90 days.

Outcome
rate of water use per daye0
Direction
peake0
Value
3.58 mm/daye0
Qualifier
during 60-90 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of water use per day increased with advance in age, reaching the peak value of 3.58 mm/day during 60-90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated wheat used more water per day than unirrigated wheat, 4.97 versus 1.89 mm/day.

Treatment
1.2IW : CPE ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.97 mm/daye0
Qualifier
1.89 mm/daye0
Comparator
unirrigatede0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was higher in irrigated crop (4.97 mm/day) under 1.2IW : CPE ratio than in the unirrigated (1.89 mm/day).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unirrigated wheat extracted more moisture from the 60-120 cm layer than irrigated wheat.

Treatment
unirrigated conditione0
Outcome
moisture was extracted from deeper layere0
Direction
Moree0
Qualifier
60-120 cme0
Comparator
irrigated conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More moisture was extracted from deeper layer (60-120 cm) under unirrigated condition than under irrigated condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased moisture depletion from 0-60 cm soil depth.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
moisture depletione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0-60 cm Soil depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application increased the moisture depletion from 0-60 cm Soil depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate-nitrogen was higher without irrigation.

Treatment
unirrigated conditione0
Outcome
nitrate-nitrogen content of the soile0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
irrigated onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrate-nitrogen content of the soil was more under unirrigated condition than under irrigated one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate-nitrogen decreased with increasing irrigation frequency.

Treatment
irrigation frequencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It decreased with increase in irrigation frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate-nitrogen increased at higher nitrogen levels.

Treatment
higher level of Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased with higher level of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, soil nitrate-nitrogen was higher at 15-30 cm than 0-15 cm under 0.9 and 1.2 IW:CPE.

Direction
highere0
Comparator
0-15 cm soil layere0
Setting
15-30 cme0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest it was higher in 15-30 cm than in 0-15 cm soil layer under 0.9 and 1.2 IW : CPE ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.