Paper · 2005 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

EFFECT OF TOOTH PICK (AMMI visnaga L.) SEED EXTRACTS ON THE RICE WEEVIL SITOPHILUS oryzae (COLEOPTERA : CURCULIONIDAE)

Salwa Ahmed; Nadra Al-Moajel

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Seeds of the tooth pick plant (Ammi visnaga L.) were extracted by organic sol-vents of different polarities, and tested for their toxic effect on Sitophilus oryzae in-festing wheat grains. Toxicity of chloroform extract, was the most potent, at both Lc50 and Lc95 levels (i.e. 3240 and 8730 ppm). Reproductive potential of treated weevil were strongly affected as no progeny were obtained when treated with either Lc50 or Lc95 with A. visnaga. Extracts treatment at Lc95 level organic extract gave protection up to 12 weeks for petroleum ether and chloroform, and 9 weeks when acetone was used for extraction. All tested extracts reduced grain germination at the end of 14 weeks storage period. Also, treated wheat grains with tooth pick extracts reduced the weight loss of grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroform extract was the most toxic to rice weevils at LC50 and LC95.

Treatment
chloroform extracte0
Interactor
Sitophilus oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee1pest
Outcome
Toxicity of chloroform extracte0
Direction
most potente0
Value
3240 and 8730 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity of chloroform extract, was the most potent, at both Lc50 and Lc95 levels (i.e. 3240 and 8730 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitophilus oryzae in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated weevils produced no progeny at either LC50 or LC95 of A. visnaga extract.

Treatment
either Lc50 or Lc95 with A. visnagae0
Interactor
Sitophilus oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee1pest
Outcome
no progenye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no progeny were obtained when treated with either Lc50 or Lc95 with A. visnaga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitophilus oryzae in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petroleum ether extract protected stored wheat grains for up to 12 weeks.

Treatment
petroleum ethere0
Outcome
protectione0
Value
12 weekse0

Not reportedInteractorComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts treatment at Lc95 level organic extract gave protection up to 12 weeks for petroleum ether and chloroform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroform extract protected stored wheat grains for up to 12 weeks.

Treatment
chloroforme0
Outcome
protectione0
Value
12 weekse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts treatment at Lc95 level organic extract gave protection up to 12 weeks for petroleum ether and chloroform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract protected stored wheat grains for 9 weeks.

Treatment
acetonee0
Outcome
9 weekse0
Value
9 weekse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9 weeks when acetone was used for extraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested extracts reduced wheat grain germination after 14 weeks of storage.

Treatment
All tested extractse0
Outcome
grain germinatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
14 weeks storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested extracts reduced grain germination at the end of 14 weeks storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-festing wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tooth pick extracts reduced weight loss of wheat grains.

Treatment
tooth pick extractse0
Outcome
weight loss of grainse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated wheat grains with tooth pick extracts reduced the weight loss of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–780 · show in text ↑

ether · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chloroform · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chloroform · Sitophilus oryzae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Sitophilus oryzae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

botanical · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.