Paper · 2010 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Effects of different mulch modes on rice production and water utilization efficiency.

Hongzhu Fan; Xiangzhong Zeng; Ji Zhang; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil temperature,growth status,grain yield and water utilization efficiency of rice grown in field were studied in the experiment.The mechanism of saving water and increasing production of three mulch mode treatments,namely,mulch of plastic film treatment(MPF),mulch of straw treatment(MS) and traditional flooding treatment(TF),were analyzed.The results showed that grain yield with MPF(6511.5 kg·hm-2)was higher than that with TF(5609.1 kg·hm-2)and MS(4798.5 kg·hm-2).Rice-mulch mode(MPF or MS) can obviously decrease water use,and water saving efficiency was 63 %.Soil temperature was markedly raised and soil moisture kept high by means of MPF.The rice growth under MPF at early transplanting stage is more exuberant than that under MS or TF,and the un-efficiency tilling is lower.Plant height,panicle length,available panicle,grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight under MPF were higher than that under MS and TF,which increase grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch rice grain yield was 6511.5 kg·hm-2, higher than traditional flooding.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6511.5 kg·hm-2e0
Comparator
TFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield with MPF(6511.5 kg·hm-2)was higher than that with TF(5609.1 kg·hm-2)and MS(4798.5 kg·hm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch rice grain yield exceeded straw mulch yield.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6511.5 kg·hm-2e0
Comparator
MSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield with MPF(6511.5 kg·hm-2)was higher than that with TF(5609.1 kg·hm-2)and MS(4798.5 kg·hm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice mulch reduced water use, with 63% water-saving efficiency.

Treatment
Rice-mulch mode(MPF or MS)e0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
63 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice-mulch mode(MPF or MS) can obviously decrease water use,and water saving efficiency was 63 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch markedly raised soil temperature.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
Soil temperaturee0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil temperature was markedly raised and soil moisture kept high by means of MPF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–647 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch kept soil moisture high.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil moisture kept high by means of MPF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–647 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice under plastic-film mulch grew more exuberantly at early transplanting than under straw mulch or flooding.

Organ / stage
early transplanting stagee0
Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
more exuberante0
Comparator
MS or TFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice growth under MPF at early transplanting stage is more exuberant than that under MS or TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch lowered ineffective tillering.

Treatment
MPFe1
Outcome
un-efficiency tillinge0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
MS or TFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the un-efficiency tilling is lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice growth under MPF at early transplanting stage is more exuberant than that under MS or TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch produced higher plant height, panicle length and available panicle count than straw mulch and flooding.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
Plant height,panicle length,available paniclee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MS and TFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height,panicle length,available panicle,grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight under MPF were higher than that under MS and TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic-film mulch produced more grains per panicle and higher 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
MPFe0
Outcome
grains per panicle and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MS and TFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight under MPF were higher than that under MS and TF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“of rice grown in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one of four comparisons with burning.

    Effect of residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield · 1998 · compared with farmers' traditional burning of crop and weed residues

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.