Paper · 1989 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Nitrogen uptake, growth rate and yield of tomatoes under saline conditions.

S. A. Al‐Rawahy

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results of two studies are reported here, a greenhouse study and a field study. In the greenhouse study, dry matter yield and nitrogen (total and 15N) uptake of leaves, stems and roots of tomato plants (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill., cv. Columbia) subjected to saline stress by NaCl were studied. The integrated effects of responses of these tissues to salinity on the whole plant basis and levels of Na⁺, Cl⁻ and K⁺ accumulation in these tissues were also studied. The treatments consisted of low (control, 0.3 bar), medium (4.3 bars), and high (8.3 bars) salinity. The saline treatments were prepared by adding NaCl to nutrient solution in sand culture. The plants were 80 days old at the start of the treatments and each was in a pot containing 1.8 kg of quartz sand. The ¹⁵N was provided to plants by adding K¹⁵NO₃ to the pots and the 15N treatment continued with the saline treatments up to 30 days. The plants were harvested at each 5-day interval during the treatment period. Dry matter production and nitrogen (total and ¹⁵N) uptake were significantly lower for saline treatments as compared with the control. Differences in dry matter production and ¹⁵N uptake on whole plant basis appeared in the latter part of the treatment period between the two saline treatments. For most of the parameters studied, the leaves were found to be affected most by salinity, the roots were intermediate in their response and the stems were the least affected by salinity. The effect of salinity on the studied parameters were attributed to osmotic effects and specific ion effects of Na⁺ and/or Cl⁻. A field study with two cultivars--Columbia and Pearson was conducted at the Safford Agricultural Center. Three N treatments were used: 0 kg N/ha, 84 kg N/ha and 168 kg N/ha and two treatments consisting of two water sources--river water with an EC of 1.15 dS/m and more saline well water of EC of 2.21 dS/m. Columbia had a significantly higher yield of tomatoes than Pearson for both water types. The N treatments had no effect on tomato yield apparently due to high residual N remaining in the field from the previous crop. Commercially acceptable fresh market yields were approached with both varieties and waters in spite of moderate salinity and sodium under heavy textural soil conditions, high temperatures and the presence of certain diseases in the area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly lowered tomato dry matter production.

Treatment
saline treatmentse0
Outcome
Dry matter productione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter production and nitrogen (total and ¹⁵N) uptake were significantly lower for saline treatments as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly lowered total and 15N uptake.

Treatment
saline treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen (total and ¹⁵N) uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter production and nitrogen (total and ¹⁵N) uptake were significantly lower for saline treatments as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two saline treatments diverged in whole-plant dry matter production late in treatment.

Treatment
two saline treatmentse0
Outcome
dry matter production and ¹⁵N uptake on whole plant basise0
Qualifier
latter part of the treatment periode0
Comparator
two saline treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in dry matter production and ¹⁵N uptake on whole plant basis appeared in the latter part of the treatment period between the two saline treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves responded most and stems least to salinity for most studied parameters.

Outcome
leaves were found to be affected most by salinity, the roots were intermediate in their response and the stems were the least affected by salinitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaves were found to be affected most by salinity, the roots were intermediate in their response and the stems were the least affected by salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Columbia yielded significantly more tomatoes than Pearson under both water types.

Material
Columbiae0
Outcome
yield of tomatoese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pearsone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Columbia had a significantly higher yield of tomatoes than Pearson for both water types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–1990 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatments did not affect tomato yield.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N treatments had no effect on tomato yield apparently due to high residual N remaining in the field from the previous crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars approached commercially acceptable fresh-market yields with both waters.

Outcome
Commercially acceptable fresh market yieldse0
Qualifier
both varieties and waterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Commercially acceptable fresh market yields were approached with both varieties and waters in spite of moderate salinity and sodium under heavy textural soil conditions, high temperatures and the presence of certain diseases in the area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2356 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 8 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.