Paper · 2011 · Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)

Exploring Rice Diversity and Biotechnology to Develop Grains With Novel Starch Properties and Altered Digestibility

Butardo, Vito

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
2
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rice is a very important cereal crop. It serves as a major source of dietary energy for more than half of the world’s population. Rice grain is usually polished to make it more acceptable to consumers. Consequently, commercially available rice grains have high glycaemic index (GI) and trace amounts of resistant starch (RS). These traits are undesirable considering the alarming global increase in the incidence of ailments like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer and obesity. The development of rice grains with reduced digestibility can be an effective strategy to manage these nutrition-associated conditions. This can be done by developing rice grains with high amylose because it is associated with elevated RS and reduced GI. Alterations to the amylopectin structure can also be investigated to determine its effect on digestibility. In this study, more than 2,500 wild and cultivated rice accessions from the International Rice Research Institute were screened for amylose content, and the digestibility of a high amylose subset was characterised. Results revealed that the in vitro RS content of the selected grains was around 1%, compared with trace amounts found in the glutinous varieties, where amylose is absent. Furthermore, the selected grains also demonstrated significant reductions in GI estimates compared to glutinous rice grains. However, the apparent amylose content (AAC) in the rice grains tested did not exceed 30%. Hence, to further investigate the structural basis for reduced digestibility and to identify potential novel approaches to increase amylose content, selected mutants were characterised. Of the mutants available for this study, Goami 2 presented the most interesting properties. It has high AAC and RS contents and the genetic basis of its mutation is still unknown. Proteins associated with the starch granule that are involved in starch biosynthesis were characterised. It was found that Goami 2 had elevated levels of an unusual isoform of starch branching enzyme IIb (SBEIIb). The genetic or structural basis of this isoform could not be uncovered in this study despite exhaustive characterisation but it may reside in an interacting gene. Interestingly, Goami 2 had elevated RS despite lack of observable elevations in true amylose chains. In contrast, the well-characterised mutant IR36ae had elevations in both true amylose and intermediate material that were accompanied by an increase in RS, but not to the extent of Goami 2. Furthermore, characterisation of grain digestibility of WAB3-5, an amylose producer in a glutinous rice background, revealed that it also had elevated RS and reduced GI. These findings suggest that aside from amylose, the intermediate chains in rice may play an important role in impacting RS contents and GI estimate. To further increase the variability of starch structure and to obtain more insights into its relationship with digestibility, transgenic experiments using hairpin RNA (hp-RNA) and artificial microRNA (amiRNA) were conducted to modify the expression of selected enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis. Previous studies of down regulating the expression of starch branching enzyme IIa (SBEIIa), SBEIIb and starch synthase IIa (SSIIa) in wheat, maize and barley, respectively, had been found to increase the amylose contents up to 50-75%. However, in this study, only minor alterations in the distribution of debranched amylopectin chains were observed when SBEIIa and SSIIa were down regulated, and it did not affect the amounts of RS. In contrast, down regulating the expression of SBEIIb led to an increase in apparent amylose (35%) and resistant starch (4.8%) contents, as well as a much lower GI estimate (44). Similar to what was observed in IR36ae and Goami 2, down regulating the expression of SBEIIb resulted in significantly elevated intermediate chains. This further strengthened the hypothesis that intermediate chains are associated with an increase in the levels of RS content and reductions in GI. These intermediate chains may be responsible for increasing the AAC values, probably because they are lightly branched and therefore can bind iodine to form a complex that absorbs in the region of 600-700 nm. Despite only subtle alterations in the debranched amylopectin structure in the lines where the expression of SSIIa was down regulated, there was still a slight reduction in glycaemic index estimate compared to its parental line Nipponbare. The rice lines had no increase in amylose and intermediate chains, and their RS content was not elevated. Interestingly, it has relatively lower proportion of debranched short amylopectin chains compared to Nipponbare, which may explain why its digestion was slowed. Decreasing the amount of short chain amylopectin could be an important target in decreasing the glycaemic index of rice, especially if it is not accompanied by any increase in amylose and intermediate chains. This is of practical importance because elevated amylose is associated with a decrease in grain and cooking qualities for many consumers, which reduces consumer acceptance. Since individually down regulating the expression of SSIIa, SBEIIa, and SBEIIb was not effective in Nipponbare in elevating the proportion of true amylose chains, the three genes were simultaneously targeted in various combinations. Simultaneous down regulation of the expression of starch enzymes have been demonstrated to be effective in producing extreme starch phenotypes in wheat, barley, maize and potato. In this study, simultaneously targeting SBEIIa and SBEIIb did not significantly improve the phenotypes compared with lines with the expression of only SBEIIb was reduced. However, the chain length distribution profile of the lines developed showed a more extensive alteration than that observed when SBEIIb alone was down regulated. Since SBEIIa was previously hypothesised to act on longer chains up to degree of polymerisation (DP) 15, it is possible that the role of SBEIIa inside the rice grain is so minor that its phenotype can only be observed when SBEIIb is also down regulated. Simultaneously targeting SSIIa and SBEIIb led to elevations in the proportion of intermediate chains and true amylose. This suggests that when glucan chain elongation (SSIIa effect) and branching activity (SBEIIb effect) are both reduced, amylose biosynthesis is favoured over amylopectin, even in a background where granule bound starch synthase I (GBSSI), critical for amylose synthesis, is only partially active, as is the case for Nipponbare. In these lines, chains up to DP17 were reduced. Furthermore, when a selected line was crossed with IR36 where GBSSI and SSIIa are more abundant and catalytically active, shrivelled grains were produced with a 50% loss of birefringent starch granules in the F1 generation. The lines from this cross are expected to produce more elevated amounts of true amylose chains at the succeeding homozygous generations. Simultaneous targeting of SSIIa, SBEIIa and SBEIIb also increased the proportion of true amylose but unexpectedly there appeared to be only minor changes in digestibility in these lines. Aside from establishing potential functional and nutritional associations with specific starch alterations, this study was also able to demonstrate for the first time that gene silencing using artificial microRNA is possible in the rice endosperm and that this technique can be more effective than the hairpin RNA technique. It also highlighted the importance of tissue-specific down regulation of gene expression in altering starch structure of rice grains. Furthermore, it also established that even minor perturbations in starch structure could be associated with differences in starch crystallinity as well as grain and starch granule morphology. Lines with partially down regulated SBEIIb using hairpin RNA appeared chalky and demonstrated the intermediate C-type crystallinity. Down regulating SBEIIa produced ‘white core’ grains in which starch granules had lost the compound structure and were severely altered in the middle of the grain. In summary, rice grains with altered starch structure and reduced digestibility have been produced using transgenic approaches. Associations between amylopectin structure and resistant starch and glycaemic index have been demonstrated, and the previously known relationships with true amylose have been confirmed. This study has also demonstrated that in Goami, an unknown gene modification has altered the starch structure that resulted in a phenotype identical those with a mutation in SBEIIb, including elevations in RS. In addition, existing germplasm has been shown not to display the variability required for dramatic alterations in digestibility. Novel starch structures for tailored digestibility may be anticipated in the future that can be tapped to alleviate nutrition-related preventable disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected high-amylose grains had around 1% in vitro resistant starch versus trace amounts in glutinous varieties.

Material
selected grainse0
Outcome
in vitro RS contente0
Value
1%e0
Comparator
glutinous varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro RS content of the selected grains was around 1%, compared with trace amounts found in the glutinous varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected grains had significantly lower GI estimates than glutinous rice.

Material
selected grainse0
Outcome
GI estimatese0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
glutinous rice grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selected grains also demonstrated significant reductions in GI estimates compared to glutinous rice grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent amylose content did not exceed 30% in tested rice grains.

Outcome
apparent amylose content (AAC)e0
Value
30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apparent amylose content (AAC) in the rice grains tested did not exceed 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goami 2 had high AAC and RS contents.

Material
Goami 2e0
Outcome
high AAC and RS contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goami 2 presented the most interesting properties. It has high AAC and RS contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goami 2 had elevated levels of an unusual SBEIIb isoform.

Material
Goami 2e0
Gene
starch branching enzyme IIb (SBEIIb)e0
Outcome
elevated levelse0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goami 2 had elevated levels of an unusual isoform of starch branching enzyme IIb (SBEIIb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goami 2 had elevated RS without elevated true amylose chains.

Material
Goami 2e0
Outcome
RSe0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goami 2 had elevated RS despite lack of observable elevations in true amylose chains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR36ae had elevated true amylose and intermediate material with increased RS.

Material
IR36aee0
Outcome
true amylose and intermediate materiale0
Direction
elevationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR36ae had elevations in both true amylose and intermediate material that were accompanied by an increase in RS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2346–2457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAB3-5 had elevated RS and reduced GI.

Material
WAB3-5e0
Outcome
RSe0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WAB3-5, an amylose producer in a glutinous rice background, revealed that it also had elevated RS and reduced GI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2549–2661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SBEIIa and SSIIa down regulation made minor amylopectin-chain changes and did not affect RS.

Treatment
SBEIIa and SSIIa were down regulatede0
Outcome
distribution of debranched amylopectin chainse0
Direction
minor alterationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only minor alterations in the distribution of debranched amylopectin chains were observed when SBEIIa and SSIIa were down regulated, and it did not affect the amounts of RS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3373–3545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SBEIIb down regulation raised apparent amylose to 35%.

Treatment
down regulating the expression of SBEIIbe0
Gene
SBEIIbe0
Outcome
apparent amylosee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down regulating the expression of SBEIIb led to an increase in apparent amylose (35%) and resistant starch (4.8%) contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3560–3682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SBEIIb down regulation raised resistant starch to 4.8%.

Treatment
down regulating the expression of SBEIIbe0
Gene
SBEIIbe0
Outcome
resistant starche0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down regulating the expression of SBEIIb led to an increase in apparent amylose (35%) and resistant starch (4.8%) contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3560–3682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SBEIIb down regulation produced a GI estimate of 44.

Treatment
down regulating the expression of SBEIIbe1
Outcome
GI estimatee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
44e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In contrast, down regulating the expression of SBEIIb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3547–3600 · show in text ↑
e0

“a much lower GI estimate (44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3695–3724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SBEIIb down regulation elevated intermediate chains significantly.

Treatment
down regulating the expression of SBEIIbe0
Outcome
intermediate chainse0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down regulating the expression of SBEIIb resulted in significantly elevated intermediate chains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3778–3873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSIIa down regulation slightly reduced GI versus Nipponbare.

Treatment
SSIIa was down regulatede0
Outcome
glycaemic index estimatee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
Nipponbaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of SSIIa was down regulated, there was still a slight reduction in glycaemic index estimate compared to its parental line Nipponbare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4327–4470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint SBEIIa and SBEIIb targeting did not significantly improve phenotypes over SBEIIb reduction alone.

Treatment
simultaneously targeting SBEIIa and SBEIIbe0
Outcome
phenotypese0
Direction
did not significantly improvee0
Comparator
lines with the expression of only SBEIIb was reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneously targeting SBEIIa and SBEIIb did not significantly improve the phenotypes compared with lines with the expression of only SBEIIb was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5548–5702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint SSIIa and SBEIIb targeting increased intermediate chains and true amylose.

Treatment
targeting SSIIa and SBEIIbe0
Outcome
proportion of intermediate chains and true amylosee0
Direction
elevationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simultaneously targeting SSIIa and SBEIIb led to elevations in the proportion of intermediate chains and true amylose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6120–6237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crossing a selected line with IR36 produced shrivelled F1 grains with 50% loss of birefringent starch granules.

Treatment
crossed with IR36e0
Outcome
loss of birefringent starch granulese0
Direction
losse0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when a selected line was crossed with IR36 where GBSSI and SSIIa are more abundant and catalytically active, shrivelled grains were produced with a 50% loss of birefringent starch granules in the F1 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6628–6837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint SSIIa, SBEIIa and SBEIIb targeting increased true amylose with minor digestibility changes.

Treatment
targeting of SSIIa, SBEIIa and SBEIIbe0
Outcome
proportion of true amylosee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simultaneous targeting of SSIIa, SBEIIa and SBEIIb also increased the proportion of true amylose but unexpectedly there appeared to be only minor changes in digestibility in these lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6976–7161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial microRNA silenced genes in rice endosperm and could outperform hairpin RNA.

Outcome
gene silencinge0
Comparator
hairpin RNA techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gene silencing using artificial microRNA is possible in the rice endosperm and that this technique can be more effective than the hairpin RNA technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7335–7486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial SBEIIb down regulation gave chalky grains with intermediate C-type crystallinity.

Treatment
partially down regulated SBEIIb using hairpin RNAe0
Outcome
chalky and demonstrated the intermediate C-type crystallinitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lines with partially down regulated SBEIIb using hairpin RNA appeared chalky and demonstrated the intermediate C-type crystallinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7814–7945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑

transgenic · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transgenic · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.